Re: [Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:37 AM, David Roberson wrote: > Does this mean that a few Nobel prizes were awarded a bit premature? Are > they ever recalled once proven in error? > All these scientists really deserve the Nobel Prize for Literature. Because it's all fiction.

Re: [Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

​A ​ related ​paper from three years ago. MOND predicts dwarf galaxy feature prior to observations ​http://phys.org/news/2013-08-mond-dwarf-galaxy-feature-prior.html "At stake now is whether the universe is predominantly made of an invisible substance that persistently eludes detection in the

RE: [Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

If one applies a bit of common sense physics, and first makes the major distinction between dark matter and dark energy … then the inevitable semantics problem becomes more focused. Some of the confusion is due to the glaring mistake of awarding the Nobel to Perlmutter, Schmidt and Riess. But –

Re: [Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:37 PM, David Roberson wrote: Does this mean that a few Nobel prizes were awarded a bit premature? Are > they ever recalled once proven in error? > It would be very embarrassing for them to have to recall Nobel prizes. I wonder whether they would

Re: [Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

[Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing? The following article describes a study calling into question one experiment upon which the notion of dark energy is based: http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/1023/Is-dark-energy-a-real-thing-Maybe-not-new-study-suggests Also of interest, two article

[Vo]:Article: Is dark energy a real thing?

The following article describes a study calling into question one experiment upon which the notion of dark energy is based: http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2016/1023/Is-dark-energy-a-real-thing-Maybe-not-new-study-suggests Also of interest, two articles discussing a study that says that the