Re: [Vo]:Article: This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics, physicist claims

[Jack Cole]

I agree Alain.  There are some elegant aspects to McCulloch's theory that
warrant investigation.  He needs a good experimentalist to test some of his
claims.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:13 AM Alain Sepeda  wrote:

> people interested in Grand Unification maye be interested by this approach
> of MiHsC that link basic newtonian graviation with Heisenberg Uncertainty
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ge_ukRbuOw
>
> MiHsC need to be studied, to be improved or refuted, as it is one of the
> few coherent way to make really QM and gravitation converge.
>
> Michael McCulloch claims it explains roughly without tuning the recently
> found anomalies in dwarf galaxies, EmDrive (even some negative=tiny
> results). His claims have to be confirmed sincerely (the hardes is to find
> someone skeptical but not in love with debunking methods), and then
> improved with good math.
>
> my feeling is that if Einstein GR geometry is in competition with MiHsC
> (which is based on SR and QM), the symmetry founding GR is respected by GU
> theories, as is Heisenberg Uncertainty.
>
> My naive feeling is that Michael McCulloch need some help from someone
> knowing well GR geometry, QM, and sincerely interested in improving MiHsC
> (Like was the mathematicien of Einstein).
>
> On point on which I wonder is if MiHsC can explain black hole observation,
> gravitational waves, gravitational lenses.
>
> 2016-08-18 14:06 GMT+02:00 Jack Cole :
>
>> This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in
>> physics, physicist claims
>>
>> http://flip.it/nxwTOa
>>
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Article: This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics, physicist claims

[ROGER ANDERTON]

unified field theory as extension of Newtonian physics was presented in 1758 by 
Boscovich; from which quantum physics was developed:
>From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Pro... |
|  |
| View on www.youtube.com | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |


whereas Einstein's relativity has numerous math mistakes built into; example:
Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its co... |
|  |
| View on www.youtube.com | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

 

On Thursday, 18 August 2016, 14:13, Alain Sepeda  
wrote:
 

 people interested in Grand Unification maye be interested by this approach of 
MiHsC that link basic newtonian graviation with Heisenberg Uncertainty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ge_ukRbuOw

MiHsC need to be studied, to be improved or refuted, as it is one of the few 
coherent way to make really QM and gravitation converge.
Michael McCulloch claims it explains roughly without tuning the recently found 
anomalies in dwarf galaxies, EmDrive (even some negative=tiny results). His 
claims have to be confirmed sincerely (the hardes is to find someone skeptical 
but not in love with debunking methods), and then improved with good math.
my feeling is that if Einstein GR geometry is in competition with MiHsC (which 
is based on SR and QM), the symmetry founding GR is respected by GU theories, 
as is Heisenberg Uncertainty.
My naive feeling is that Michael McCulloch need some help from someone knowing 
well GR geometry, QM, and sincerely interested in improving MiHsC (Like was the 
mathematicien of Einstein).
On point on which I wonder is if MiHsC can explain black hole observation, 
gravitational waves, gravitational lenses.
2016-08-18 14:06 GMT+02:00 Jack Cole :

This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics, 
physicist claimshttp://flip.it/nxwTOa



  

Re: [Vo]:Article: This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics, physicist claims

[Alain Sepeda]

people interested in Grand Unification maye be interested by this approach
of MiHsC that link basic newtonian graviation with Heisenberg Uncertainty

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ge_ukRbuOw

MiHsC need to be studied, to be improved or refuted, as it is one of the
few coherent way to make really QM and gravitation converge.

Michael McCulloch claims it explains roughly without tuning the recently
found anomalies in dwarf galaxies, EmDrive (even some negative=tiny
results). His claims have to be confirmed sincerely (the hardes is to find
someone skeptical but not in love with debunking methods), and then
improved with good math.

my feeling is that if Einstein GR geometry is in competition with MiHsC
(which is based on SR and QM), the symmetry founding GR is respected by GU
theories, as is Heisenberg Uncertainty.

My naive feeling is that Michael McCulloch need some help from someone
knowing well GR geometry, QM, and sincerely interested in improving MiHsC
(Like was the mathematicien of Einstein).

On point on which I wonder is if MiHsC can explain black hole observation,
gravitational waves, gravitational lenses.

2016-08-18 14:06 GMT+02:00 Jack Cole :

> This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics,
> physicist claims
>
> http://flip.it/nxwTOa
>

[Vo]:Article: This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics, physicist claims

[Jack Cole]

This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in physics,
physicist claims

http://flip.it/nxwTOa