accounting of the supply
input power contribution.
I hope that this report holds up under careful skeptical analysis.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jack Cole
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Jan 7, 2017 8:22 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release
Yes, they would be wise to
: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release
Jack Cole mailto:jcol...@gmail.com> > wrote:
The input power being mis-measured is one possibility that has not been
discussed in sufficient detail to know if they have ruled this out.
This is not a detailed report. I expec
Jack Cole wrote:
> The input power being mis-measured is one possibility that has not been
> discussed in sufficient detail to know if they have ruled this out.
>
This is not a detailed report. I expect they have ruled it out, by methods
not described here.
> Since Godes is an EE, it might
Yes, they would be wise to assume the results are false, and make every
effort to disprove the results. Start with the thought process of,
"Assuming this is an artifact, what can explain it?" The input power being
mis-measured is one possibility that has not been discussed in sufficient
detail to
Jed Rothwell wrote:
I think Brian wants them to measure power going into the power
supplies. That sounds like a good idea to me. Probably a lot is lost
between the power supply input and the reactor core, but you could
still compare a null run to an excess heat run. You could confirm that
th
Okay, I have read this SRI report a few times. I have a good impression. I
need to think about it more, but so far, so good.
People at lenr-forum complained there is not much about errors or the
margin of error. That's true, but there is some discussion. They say the
errors are less than 5%. That
I wonder if Ni Nano particles are involved? Is there a patent in the USA for
the IPB HHT?
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 1:29 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release
See:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum
See:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/4795-Press-Release-BERKELEY-CLEAN-TECHNOLOGY-COMPANY-ANNOUNCES-BREAKTHROUGH-FOR-LENR-/
The press release begins:
BERKELEY CLEAN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY ANNOUNCES BREAKTHROUGH FOR LENR POWER
DEVICES
Controllable-on-Demand, Reproducible, Transport
Axil, is there some context to this rather short sentence in light of that
Brillouin press-release?
Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa.
> On 18 Nov 2015, at 23:59, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> It is alway wise to tell the truth.
>
>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>> Nov
It is alway wise to tell the truth.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> November 18, 2015
>
> CONGRESS VIEWS BRILLOUIN ENERGY’S LENR WET™ AND HHT™ BOILER REACTOR
> SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING THERMAL ENERGY
>
>
> http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/456-Brillouin-E
November 18, 2015
CONGRESS VIEWS BRILLOUIN ENERGY’S LENR WET™ AND HHT™ BOILER REACTOR SYSTEMS
FOR GENERATING THERMAL ENERGY
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/456-Brillouin-Energy-Meets-Congress-News-Release-18-11-15-1-pdf/
Among other things this says:
The LENR process is nei
11 matches
Mail list logo