Horace Heffner wrote:
Also to be fair to Britz, ever since the early days of the true
believers and skeptics on sci.physics.fusion, Dieter Britz has
maintained that he is neutral on the subject, keeping an open mind.
He is neither one of the faithful nor an atheist, but rather an agnostic.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Your paper on this, also based on the Britz bibliography, is at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf, and, reading
numbers (approx) from your chart,
year totals cumulative totals
pos neg neutral pos neg
I wrote:
If someone like Britz or Prof. Dylla of the AIP were to come out and
declare unequivocally and publicly they think cold fusion is real,
they would land in a world of trouble. They know that!
To be fair to Britz, he has also at times defended the reputations of
researchers, if not
Am I daft? Why is he cc Jones? Because he challenged Steve?
SJ is deep end challenged, IMO.
T
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
If someone like Britz or Prof. Dylla of the AIP were to come out and
declare unequivocally and publicly they
On Feb 9, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
To be fair to Britz, he has also at times defended the reputations
of researchers, if not their results. He has distanced himself from
the extreme tactics of his fellow skeptics.
Also to be fair to Britz, ever since the early days of the
At 03:46 PM 2/9/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Your paper on this, also based on the Britz bibliography, is at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf, and, reading
numbers (approx) from your chart,
year totals cumulative totals
6 matches
Mail list logo
