[Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote: I am happy to see such a neat application was found for Grigg's technology. I hope he has benefited from it. Griggs left the company many years ago. The company seems to be doing well. They no longer talk about the fact that their machine

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Daniel Rocha
What do you mean by excess heat? I thought it was a link to a website of bio fuel.

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: What do you mean by excess heat? I thought it was a link to a website of bio fuel. It is a long story. The Hydrodynamics gadget produces heat by generating ultrasound. Under some circumstances it appears to produce anomalous excess heat. Many years ago

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Daniel Rocha
Do you have links for articles regarding this experiment? It looks like fishy.

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Jed Rothwell
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have links for articles regarding this experiment? It looks like fishy. See p. 43-1 here: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EPRIproceedingc.pdf it was not fishy. I do not do fishy stuff. It was inconclusive. it is unfinished business. If cold

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Daniel Rocha
Jed, there isn't something called cold fusion. The most reasonable papers, since Schwinger, consider the solid as a kind of powerful device to converge and collide phonons in a small region with an energy of several million degrees, and these phonons also block and take away the heavy radiation

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 2, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: Jed, there isn't something called cold fusion. This has to be one of the very best newbie statements I have ever seen on this list! It wouldn't have been so emotion evoking if it hadn't been directed at Jed. 8^))) Best regards, Horace

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Daniel Rocha
Funny thing it is that I read more than 100 papers on his website.

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Daniel Rocha
Let me reinstate that phrase. There shouldn`t be something called cold fusion, it doesn`t make sense. Millons a temperature of several thousand KeV is required to get over the coulomb barrier as well as a very hard shield is required to absorb the gamma rays. Any serious theory takes that into

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: Let me reinstate that phrase. There shouldn`t be something called cold fusion, it doesn`t make sense. Millons a temperature of several thousand KeV is required to get over the coulomb barrier as well as a very hard shield is required to

Re: [Vo]:Comments about Hydrodynamics

2011-09-02 Thread Daniel Rocha
I mentioned the focusing of phonons. They are lattice vibrations, so the situation where fusion happens is similar to the collapse of a bubble in sonofusion or the implosion of a fission bomb. The specific details for branching ratios varies or how the collective phenomena varies from theory to