Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-22 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:50 PM 2/21/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:40:47 -0500: Hi, [snip] But the result that is known is that helium is produced, and the observed energy supports the conclusion that the primary fuel is deuterium. unknown nuclear

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-22 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:54 PM 2/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: What about in the core of the sun? What mechanism operates there, if not brute force? All that is necessary is that the temperature be great enough that some level of fusion occurs. It's enough that the Boltzmann tail allows enough nuclei to have

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:51 AM 2/21/2011, Horace Heffner wrote: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/21/rothwell-makes-pre-emptive-strike-against-new-lenr-textbook/ http://tinyurl.com/4s3xhjt Right there, in a nutshell, is perfect evidence as to Krivit's effective demise as a reporter on LENR. This leads

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Ah. It seems Wiley has not agreed to publish this textbook. That is relief! I tried to ask Krivit about this textbook, but as I said, he refused to talk to me. He acted as if I was not there. When I tapped him on the shoulder he walked away. An extraordinary thing to do! If he had paused for a

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
This was all a tempest in a teapot! Good thing. I sent a message to the Wiley editor, pointing to Krivit's article, and apologizing for the misunderstanding. Regarding Abd's comments, several potential authors told me that Krivit pulled this stunt of pretending you are not there. I mentioned

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 09:50 AM 2/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: Ah. It seems Wiley has not agreed to publish this textbook. That is relief! I tried to ask Krivit about this textbook, but as I said, he refused to talk to me. He acted as if I was not there. When I tapped him on the shoulder he walked away. An

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:38 AM 2/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: This was all a tempest in a teapot! Good thing. I sent a message to the Wiley editor, pointing to Krivit's article, and apologizing for the misunderstanding. Regarding Abd's comments, several potential authors told me that Krivit pulled this stunt

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:38 AM 2/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote: This was all a tempest in a teapot! Good thing. I sent a message to the Wiley editor, pointing to Krivit's article, and apologizing for the misunderstanding. Your letter may have done good, pointing out to Wiley that there could be problems with

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Jed, your mail talked about the rejection as being of a whole group, not just you. Did you extrapolate from your own experience to that of the group, or do you have any other testimony to present? Three others told me Krivit was pretending they were not there.

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread mixent
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:40:47 -0500: Hi, [snip] But the result that is known is that helium is produced, and the observed energy supports the conclusion that the primary fuel is deuterium. unknown nuclear reaction would bring us full circle. That is

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
mix...@bigpond.com wrote: Even hot fusion operates on tunneling rather than overcoming the Coulomb barrier by brute force. (The latter would require about 30 MeV). You mean Tokamak plasma fusion on earth. Right? What about in the core of the sun? What mechanism operates there, if not brute

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread mixent
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:50:02 +1100: Hi, Sorry, for D-D fusion 30 MeV is wrong. It would take about 1 MeV. In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:40:47 -0500: Hi, [snip] But the result that is known is that helium is

Re: [Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-21 Thread mixent
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:54:52 -0500: Hi, [snip] mix...@bigpond.com wrote: Even hot fusion operates on tunneling rather than overcoming the Coulomb barrier by brute force. (The latter would require about 30 MeV). You mean Tokamak plasma fusion on earth.

[Vo]:Counter-strike launched in textbook controversy

2011-02-20 Thread Horace Heffner
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/21/rothwell-makes-pre-emptive- strike-against-new-lenr-textbook/ http://tinyurl.com/4s3xhjt Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/