Re: [Vo]:DGT citation: unsuccesful test of end of july 2011
This is a fake message from a Swedish forum. They are laughing at you! :D http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2t=217start=110
[Vo]:DGT citation: unsuccesful test of end of july 2011
Was offline a couple of days. Mayme, its not new to you. Just saw this citation on a swedish website, it may help to explain why Defkalion did not pay EFA srl (Rossis wife), and Rossi was upset. citation: The Licence and Technology Transfer Agreement (The LTTA) contains a mile stone payment arrangement. According to said arrangement, DGT's release of the first payment to EFA is pending on that EFA meet several technical requirements. As anticipated in the LTTA for the purpose of determining if EFA has met said requirements, a test was performed in late July 2011. While the test conclusively showed that most of these requirements indeed were reached, some were not; the most important one being full working stability of the reactor. As provided in the LTTA, DGT therefore requested a second test. However, EFA has refused to participate in such a test despite the fact that such non-participation clearly constitutes a material breach of contract. Such a test is and has always been a prerequisite for DGT confidently going forward with the collaboration with EFA. -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
Re: [Vo]:DGT citation: unsuccesful test of end of july 2011
citation: However, EFA has refused to participate in such a test despite the fact that such non-participation clearly constitutes a material breach of contract. Likely because they know they cannot meet the stability requirements at this time. Revealing! T
Re: [Vo]:DGT citation: unsuccesful test of end of july 2011
On 2011-08-11 01:02, Angela Kemmler wrote: Was offline a couple of days. Mayme, its not new to you. Just saw this citation on a swedish website, it may help to explain why Defkalion did not pay EFA srl (Rossis wife), and Rossi was upset. [snip] Be warned that Defkalion GT is apparently trying to act legally against sources who according to them are spreading misinformation or falsities. I'm referring for example to the email that can be (as of now) seen on this page (search for Anonymous Email From An Inside Source at Defkalion), that you might have missed: http://pesn.com/2011/08/09/9501890_Rossi_Gives_Reason_for_Split_from_Defkalion/ Cheers, S.A.
Re: [Vo]:DGT citation: unsuccesful test of end of july 2011
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.de wrote: citation: The Licence and Technology Transfer Agreement (The LTTA) contains a mile stone payment arrangement. According to said arrangement, DGT's release of the first payment to EFA is pending on that EFA meet several technical requirements. As anticipated in the LTTA for the purpose of determining if EFA has met said requirements, a test was performed in late July 2011. While the test conclusively showed that most of these requirements indeed were reached, some were not; the most important one being full working stability of the reactor. As provided in the LTTA, DGT therefore requested a second test. However, EFA has refused to participate in such a test despite the fact that such non-participation clearly constitutes a material breach of contract. Such a test is and has always been a prerequisite for DGT confidently going forward with the collaboration with EFA. can you provide a link?
