[Vo]:Enormous current densities in nanowires

2012-01-09 Thread pagnucco
Ref[1] points out that certain nanowires can carry enormous current densities (~ 10^11[A/cm^2]) which vaporize macro-sized wires. In metals, this equates to ballistic electron speeds of ~ 100 km/sec - approximately the same as (0-Amp) random thermal electron velocity - far greater than a

Re: [Vo]:Enormous current densities in nanowires

2012-01-09 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Ref[1] points out that certain nanowires can carry enormous current densities (~ 10^11[A/cm^2]) which vaporize macro-sized wires. In metals, this equates to ballistic electron speeds of ~ 100 km/sec - approximately the same as (0-Amp)

Re: [Vo]:Enormous current densities in nanowires

2012-01-09 Thread pagnucco
Horace, thanks for the reply. You wrote: You should keep in mind that in nanowires, even (laser induced) thermal pulses move at 2x10^6 m/s, the conduction band electron speed. Yes. There are electron-lattice mechanical couplings (e.g,, pinches, phonons, ...) that complicate a simple,

Re: [Vo]:Enormous current densities in nanowires

2012-01-09 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jan 9, 2012, at 8:11 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Following are some comments on the validity of WL theory: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg38261.html Lots of good questions, but my example is not ambitious enough to answer them. I just wanted to see whether

Re: [Vo]:Enormous current densities in nanowires

2012-01-09 Thread pagnucco
Horace, You parse comments way too precisely. I should have said that your observations raise questions. For instance, a key one is - The WL math and QM is possibly controversial (e.g. via Hagelstein and Chaudhary), but the logic and common sense in problem definition and conclusions are