[Vo]:Forbes brief article on $10M ARPA-E fund
DOE Mentions Technology Behind The Home Nuclear Reactor In Funding Opportunity http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2014/01/04/doe-mentions-technology-behind-the-home-nuclear-reactor-in-funding-opportunity/
Re: [Vo]:Forbes brief article on $10M ARPA-E fund
LENR technology has suffered from confusion with “cold fusion”http://newenergytimes.com/v2/reports/LENR-is-Not-Cold-Fusion.shtml, which has largely been dismissed by the scientific community. On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:22 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: DOE Mentions Technology Behind The Home Nuclear Reactor In Funding Opportunity http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2014/01/04/doe-mentions-technology-behind-the-home-nuclear-reactor-in-funding-opportunity/
Re: [Vo]:Forbes brief article on $10M ARPA-E fund
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: LENR technology has suffered from confusion with “cold fusion”, which has largely been dismissed by the scientific community. It's encouraging to see that a journalist at Forbes has taken up the LENR scoop again. This one does not appear to realize that he has adopted the Krivit/Larsen account of the world wholecloth. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Forbes brief article on $10M ARPA-E fund
I feel it is the manipulation that I describe as history rewritten by the losers. instead of admitting they screwed up, they will blame cold fusion... what ever is the theory, the fact is that the calorimetry was ignored, and that is a scientific crime. point. end of science here. 2014/1/4 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: LENR technology has suffered from confusion with “cold fusion”, which has largely been dismissed by the scientific community. It's encouraging to see that a journalist at Forbes has taken up the LENR scoop again. This one does not appear to realize that he has adopted the Krivit/Larsen account of the world wholecloth. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Forbes brief article on $10M ARPA-E fund WIKI'd
DOE ARPA-E Funding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion#DOE_ARPA-E_Funding In Jan, 2014 Forbes reported that The Department of Energy included low energy nuclear reactions—which NASA scientists have said could fuel home nuclear reactors—among other representative technologies in a $10 million funding opportunity it announced last fall.[185] Table 1 includes : 3.6 chemonuclear reactors, low-energy nuclear reactions, nuclear fuel chemistry[186] 184: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2014/01/04/doe-mentions-technology-beh ind-the-home-nuclear-reactor-in-funding-opportunity/ 185: https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=1c56ac4a-0acd-43ee-a2ec- ab80b33f4146
Re: [Vo]:Forbes brief article on $10M ARPA-E fund WIKI'd
ARPA-E selects reviewers based on their knowledge and understanding of the relevant field and application, their experience and skills, and their ability to provide constructive feedback on applications. Is there any mechanism for disqualifying Hot-fusion (Coulomb-bound) reviewers from stomping on LENR applications?
