Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-14 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Kyle Mcallister kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com wrote: P.S., Re: My Mylow motor. No, it don't work. Still trying, of course, but primarily because my wife thinks it is fun. If you find it will never work, just for fun, hoax it using one of the suggested methods (or

Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: If you find it will never work, just for fun, hoax it using one of the suggested methods (or your own) . . . You may find it is not as easy to make a convincing looking hoax. Not only is it difficult, but in many cases, the notion that these o-u claims are hoaxes

RE: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-12 Thread Kyle Mcallister
--- Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote: Kyle, Pardon my ignorant, irrational excursion into green shock technology. What you are saying here makes perfect practical sense, even though the PS article played it up so nicely. I am a retired designer of large scale power generating

Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-11 Thread Michel Jullian
2009/5/10 Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com: 2009/5/10, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt.stea...@gmail.com: You're right of course, Kyle, except the trend will be that vehicle suspensions will be active and computer controlled and the energy recovery will be a natural result of the motor drive

Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-10 Thread Michel Jullian
Even on a perfectly smooth road there must be a lot of energy wasted in conventional shock absorbers, whenever you accelerate, brake, go round a bend... If it's of the order of 1 kW or even 100W on average, then Jeff is right that it's certainly worth recovering! Has anyone checked whether

Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-10 Thread Kyle Mcallister
--- Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote: Even on a perfectly smooth road there must be a lot of energy wasted in conventional shock absorbers, whenever you accelerate, brake, go round a bend... If it's of the order of 1 kW or even 100W on average, then Jeff is right that it's

RE: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-10 Thread Jeff Fink
on that subject either. Jeff ;-) -Original Message- From: Kyle Mcallister [mailto:kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 1:09 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks --- Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote: Even

RE: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-10 Thread Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
it on it's way and call it to come back when you want it. Hoyt Stearns Scottsdale, Arizona, US -Original Message- From: Jeff Fink [mailto:rev...@ptd.net] Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 10:49 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks Kyle, Pardon my ignorant

Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-10 Thread OrionWorks
From Hoyt, ... With the next generation of vehicles Steorn ORBO powered, Howard Johnson/Mylow powered, Pons-Fleischmann powered, Hydrino powered, Focus fusion powered, Griggs sonofusion powered, Bearden and Goldes powered, no one will give a rat's ass about efficiency anymore, so this is

[Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-09 Thread Jeff Fink
About a year or two ago Kyle, you jumped all over my idea of harnessing the power wasted in automobile shock absorbers. Check out the June 09 Popular Science, page 48. Jeff

Re: [Vo]:Hey Kyle: power generating shocks

2009-05-09 Thread Kyle Mcallister
--- Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote: About a year or two ago Kyle, you jumped all over my idea of harnessing the power wasted in automobile shock absorbers. Check out the June 09 Popular Science, page 48. Don't have it in front of me, but a little Googling turns up some things. 1kW of