I wrote:
What I would love to see are some (very) simple statements that all can
agree on that, if tested and found conclusively true or false to everyone's
satisfaction, would help to sift between the competing explanations.
I offer one such possible statement as an example:
- Ionization
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
What I would love to see are some (very) simple statements that all can
agree on that, if tested and found conclusively true or false to everyone's
satisfaction, would help to sift between the competing
-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, May 3, 2012 11:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR detailitis
I wrote:
What I would love to see are some (very) simple statements that all can agree
on that, if tested and found conclusively true or false
Eric,
Already understood. H=p+ + e- What do you think ionization is? I side
with Chan.
http://chan.host-ed.me/
ZAP energy = H2 = proton cation plus hydride anion (See image on
site). Or obtain from metal hydride. Hydride anion fits into Ni nano
matrix structure in an orderly manner. Then
*Then under influence of magnetic and gravitational fields,*
* *
When the only driver in the system is heat, where does the magnetic field
come from.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, integral.property.serv...@gmail.com
integral.property.serv...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric,
Already understood.
Axil,
FYI: http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/563nh.htm
and perhaps a peek at a discard I dug out of the trash basket next to
my desk sent by a fellow interested person:
1. Consider the nucleus of any virtual partial A
a. A is positively charged.
2. Consider a subset of A, As with a unit
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:29 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
You are assuming that hydrogen is the only element that can be used in an
LENR reaction. This should be verified.
You bring up an excellent point. My wording was not careful enough -- I
should have made reference to
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
- Below a certain threshold, there is a direct correlation
between temperature and heat.
Ha! I sure hope there is. I meant, a direct correlation between cell
temperature and power or something like that.
Eric
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Is it truly cold and is it truly fusion? Well, it's got to be nuclear in
nature, but until we know what it *is* -- and we don't -- we can't rule
anything out, not completely.
Abd, you bring up some excellent
Dear Abd,
Thank for writing here, this opens ways to a good discussion, not focused
on minor details.
I think what we have in common and motivates both of us is the care for the
future of the LENR field.
As regarding in which extent I agree with you, it is very exactly 50%.
You say: *At this
]:LENR detailitis
My dear friends,
I have sinned again, this time it is about more capital sins.
See please:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/05/detailitis-kills-discussion-in-lenr-too.html
Best wishes to you all,
Peter--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
I responded, anonymously, but it should be pretty obvious it was me
I've been harping on the same theme for months now.
At this point, we need more science and pure scientific investigation
(controlled experiment), and, arguably, less attempt to scale up and
make it more reliable. Cold
12 matches
Mail list logo
