Re: [Vo]:Mo wins

2013-07-12 Thread mixent
In reply to H Veeder's message of Thu, 4 Jul 2013 11:24:41 -0400: Hi, [snip] The problem with the explanation offered in the video is that it could apply to a rope but ropes don't behave like that so the explanation is not specific to the behaviour of the chain. Harry It may be related to the

Re: [Vo]:Mo wins

2013-07-11 Thread H Veeder
I think it might be related (in an oblique way) to the Kaye effect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrVlq2AgwyA Harry On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: ** ** *From:* H Veeder ** ** The problem with the explanation offered in the video is that

Re: [Vo]:Mo wins

2013-07-11 Thread H Veeder
Paper on the Kaye effect http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0603183 Shear-thinning fluids exhibit surprisingly rich behaviour. One example is the Kaye effect which occurs when a thin stream of a solution of polyisobutylene in Decalin is poured into a dish of the fluid. As pouring proceeds, a small

[Vo]:Mo wins

2013-07-04 Thread Jones Beene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=6ukMId5fIi0 ... not Mo of the 3 stooges, but the big Mo of momentum. Is it any wonder why perpmo inventors can fall into self-delusion so easily? attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [Vo]:Mo wins

2013-07-04 Thread H Veeder
The problem with the explanation offered in the video is that it could apply to a rope but ropes don't behave like that so the explanation is not specific to the behaviour of the chain. Harry On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

RE: [Vo]:Mo wins

2013-07-04 Thread Jones Beene
From: H Veeder The problem with the explanation offered in the video is that it could apply to a rope but ropes don't behave like that so the explanation is not specific to the behaviour of the chain. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded

RE: [Vo]:Mo wins

2013-07-04 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
The problem with the explanation offered in the video is that it could apply to a rope but ropes don't behave like that so the explanation is not specific to the behaviour of the chain. Harry Your comment strikes me as a little confusing. Shouldn't you have said that the explanation