to experience a
probability of a Coulomb barrier depletion.
--- On Mon, 9/3/12, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Nanomagnetism, QCD Goldstone bosons (part 1)
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Monday, September 3, 2012, 6:39 PM
to the metallic atoms caging the protons close enough together to experience a
probability of a Coulomb barrier depletion.
From: Jones Beene
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Nanomagnetism, QCD Goldstone bosons (part 1)
Well – yes – the theory is falsifiable in exactly this way, but of course - you
only do
If you are asking for a personal opinion, then it is not a simple yes or no.
I believe Papp demonstrated a way to convert radioactive isotopes, mostly
radium/radon, into electricity at higher than expected efficiency, and that
is all there was to it. You cannot ready his biography - including the
Same counts for Keshe foundation
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If you are asking for a personal opinion, then it is not a simple yes or
no.
I believe Papp demonstrated a way to convert radioactive isotopes, mostly
radium/radon, into electricity at
Spooky/crazy action at a distance. Works the same in people associated
with it...
On Tuesday, September 4, 2012, Teslaalset wrote:
Same counts for Keshe foundation
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Jones Beene
jone...@pacbell.netjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'jone...@pacbell.net');
wrote:
An arcane concept - the Goldstone boson, could be one key to understanding
the emergent nanomagnetism hypothesis for energy gain in Ni-H. The energy
transfer originates from strong force and QCD color change dynamics, and
therefore from the nuclear pion (via slight depletion of proton mass) then
...@pacbell.net
Subject: [Vo]:Nanomagnetism, QCD Goldstone bosons (part 1)
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Monday, September 3, 2012, 8:26 AM
An arcane concept - the Goldstone boson, could be one key to understanding
the emergent nanomagnetism hypothesis for energy gain in Ni-H. The energy
transfer originates
Energy comes from proton mass depletion
So... the way to test this theory is to weigh the thing before after the
experiment? Does any LENR researcher have equipment sensitive enough to detect
the difference in proton mass depletion?
Yeah, this might be interesting enough to motivate another few weeks of
frantic reading. And I just got done with electron capture, sheesh. ;-)
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:06 PM, helloke...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Energy comes from proton mass depletion
So... the way to test this theory is to weigh
Well - yes - the theory is falsifiable in exactly this way, but of course -
you only do mass spectrometry on the hydrogen fill not the entire device.
And yes - at least I have heard that SRI has an instrument sensitive enough
to do this kind of measurement on hydrogen - but for whatever
The underlying major hypothesis for ultimate gain is mass-to-energy
conversion, but with little or no fission, beta decay, non-reversible
fusion, or transmutation. There can be slight transmutation from QM
tunneling but far from sufficient to account for gain. The proton mass is
not quantized and
Do you favor the mystery energy source claims of LeClair and Papp? Cheers:
axil
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The underlying major hypothesis for ultimate gain is mass-to-energy
conversion, but with little or no fission, beta decay, non-reversible
12 matches
Mail list logo
