Hi Lennart
I haven't been ignoring you. Just lack adequate time. Now that I'm retired it
sometimes feels as if I have less time at my disposal than ever. ...not that
I'm really complaining about it.
I have to ask you. Were you the middle sibling growing up in your family?
Always the
t; “I cannot imagine there is anyone person who would identify his believes
> with either party.”
>
> Can you please clarify???
>
>
>
> B Well,
>
> -mark
>
>
>
> *From:* Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:
Hi Mark, my old nemesis. ;-)
Regarding the "rant" word accusation see the following link out in the Vortex
archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105057.html
specifically, your statement:
> 3- but then, what comes to mind whenever I see anything (OT) from
is believes with
either party.”
Can you please clarify???
B Well,
-mark
From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:39 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is buying
the 2016 presidential ra
Steven,
No, I was not the middle sibling - the oldest of two.
This is the first time in my life I have been called a peace maker.
I think that is not all accurate. However, I believe that finding logical,
sensitive and productive solutions is important.
I am fine being controversial but it is not
graphics depicting who is buying
the 2016 presidential race
Hi Mark, my old nemesis. ;-)
Regarding the "rant" word accusation see the following link out in the Vortex
archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105057.html
specifically, your statemen
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 2016 presidential race
Mark,
I'm impressed by your earnestne
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is buying
the 2016 presidential race
Mark and Steven,
I think you both miss the point. 'You think the dollars spent on election
campaigns are a non-issue.
I think it is terrible to spend money
Mark and Steven,
I think you both miss the point. 'You think the dollars spent on election
campaigns are a non-issue.
I think it is terrible to spend money to be informed of two candidates with
almost the same agenda. Yes we spend money - if nothing else we talk about
tax free contributions.
More
Mark,
I'm impressed by your earnestness in wanting to get clarification. I'll just
focus on one exchange. What motivated me to go on the offensive, so to
speak, was the first comment you made, which was:
> The NYT article is so blatantly one-sided, but of course, you know that...
> at
money,
REGARDLESS of which party is flows to.
Best Always,
-mark
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 6:33 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 2016 pre
Hi Mark,
I must ask: where was the alleged "rant" in my original post? I pointed to a
link that showed some interesting graphics about where political money is
coming from. In your mind, does pointing to a link now constitute another
"rant" coming from me? Do the links I submit for the Vort
B Well Always,
-mark
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 8:53 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 2016 presidential race
Hi Mark,
I must as
E: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 2016 presidential race
Good morning Steven,
I think you are referring to this statement of mine:
". I believe you are the one who has, by far, pontificated at length about
political/religious issues;"
That i
3:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is
buying the 2016 presidential race
Hello again Mark,
I stand by what I have said before. To repeat myself, to endlessly
reinterpret what I have said before lies madness. I'm conten
>From NY Times. Enjoy!
158 Families Make Up Half of 2016 Election Funding
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/11/us/politics/2016-presidential-
election-super-pac-donors.html?hp=click=Homepage=photo-
spot-region=top-news=top-news&_r=1
http://tinyurl.com/n9u26t6
Regards,
Steven Vincent
Sunday, October 11, 2015 9:25 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is buying
> the 2016 presidential race
>
> From NY Times. Enjoy!
>
> 158 Families Make Up Half of 2016 Election Funding
>
>
> http://www.nytimes
Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 9:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:OT: Interesting interactive graphics depicting who is buying
the 2016 presidential race
>From NY Times. Enjoy!
158 Families Make Up Half of 2016 Election Funding
h
Hi Mark,
> The NYT article is so blatantly one-sided, but of course, you know that...
> at least, I hope you do.
It's been my experience that when someone feigns praise upon another
person's alleged intelligence but then immediately turns around and
questions whether the praise they had
19 matches
Mail list logo
