Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
**
Given that the topic is phrases that should be abandoned, can we do away
with extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence ?
Amen.
Here is what Melich and I wrote about this:
[DoE 2004 review] claim 1.5. “As many have said, extraordinary
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
**
Given that the topic is phrases that should be abandoned, can we do away
with extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence ?
That phrase (or some form of it) is usually attributed to Truzzi, but the
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hume said: A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence.
***Hume also wrote the following, which applies to Joshua Cude, who
absurdly claims that Pons Fleischmann were not careful electrochemical
experimenters and
I had not seen this good defense before. I will ask the author if I can
post up the chunk on cf.
On 5/9/13 3:11 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
‘Pathological Science’ is not Scientific Misconduct
(nor is it pathological)
Henry H. Bauer*
Abstract: ‘Pathological’ science implies scientific
4 matches
Mail list logo
