Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-14 Thread Jones Beene
An example? http://current.com/items/87014271_elemental_the_generator_that_runs_on_background_radiation Frederick Sparber wrote: Jones. A bound state of e- e+ e- (about 10^12 % according to CRC tables) is known. With a mass about 207 times that of the electron and about 0.5 MeV

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-04 Thread Frederick Sparber
Instead of laboring over cathode treatment in random replication results for gas discharge or electrolysis CF reactions, why not use Muonic Altered Water: MAW, that can be obtained by bombarding an electrical discharge in Steam in front of a Muon Source, like the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-04 Thread thomas malloy
Frederick Sparber wrote: Isn't it strange that Ed Storms' paper reports no gammas either, yet the radiation implies particle energies in the MeV range? Note the effect of oxygen and hydrocarbons in the Storms experiment where one would expect the quasi-stable entity to be found. (Argon in the

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-04 Thread Edmund Storms
The cold fusion process does not produce gamma for several reasons. Immediate release of gamma does not occur because such a reaction is not effective in conserving the momentum of the reaction. Instead, if a reaction is to occur at all, two charged particle must be emitted. Of course, some of

[Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-03 Thread Frederick Sparber
Jones. A bound state of e- e+ e- (about 10^12 % according to CRC tables) is known. With a mass about 207 times that of the electron and about 0.5 MeV they could make a burn spot on the center of your old TV CRT before they came up with the bent gun. OTOH, a 1/207 fractional hydrino orbit of

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-03 Thread Frederick Sparber
P.N. Correa speaks on an anomaly. *http://web.globalserve.net/~lambdac/PwrfromAEemissions.html*http://web.globalserve.net/~lambdac/PwrfromAEemissions.html * In a speculative fashion, it is indeed interesting to remark that the PAGD energies associated with emitted cathode ions are in the range

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-03 Thread Jones Beene
Well - there should lots of strong gammas then, for Correa to confirm his specualtion, no? Not to mention, it would be nice if Correa had had a single independent replication in all these years, and/or could quote from another source than his own work or Aspden ;-) Nevertheless - he has

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-03 Thread Standing Bear
On Monday 03 December 2007 09:48, Frederick Sparber wrote: Jones. A bound state of e- e+ e- (about 10^12 % according to CRC tables) is known. With a mass about 207 times that of the electron and about 0.5 MeV they could make a burn spot on the center of your old TV CRT before they came

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-03 Thread Frederick Sparber
Isn't it strange that Ed Storms' paper reports no gammas either, yet the radiation implies particle energies in the MeV range? Note the effect of oxygen and hydrocarbons in the Storms experiment where one would expect the quasi-stable entity to be found. (Argon in the O2 ?) A deuteron or proton

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quasi-Stable Negative Muons or Heavy Positronium-Electronium?

2007-12-03 Thread Frederick Sparber
An extensive treatment of the interaction of water on solid surfaces (about 10 megabytes) gives insight on how a Muonic Entity could catalyze CF reactions on the cathode of an electrolysis cell. It also touches on the effect of oxygen wrt the water interaction with the surfaces.