Re: [Vo]:Re: Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mark Jurich  wrote:

Folks, you send “water” through a hole in the wall, and back comes
> something.  You can’t assume it’s water.
>

Yes.



>   You have to analyze it.  Want me to give you a few dozen more examples
> of this, where you can’t assume? ... Knowing what the customer is doing
> with the water educates one in what to look for and what may be suspect in
> the test.
>

My point exactly. Plus, this is a direct reality check.

- Jed


[Vo]:Re: Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread Mark Jurich
Folks, you send “water” through a hole in the wall, and back comes something.  
You can’t assume it’s water.  You have to analyze it. 
Want me to give you a few dozen more examples of this, where you can’t assume? 
... Knowing what the customer is doing with the water 
educates one in what to look for and what may be suspect in the test.

- Mark Jurich