Re: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!

2016-02-22 Thread Bob Higgins
I asked the supplier that specific question. If we wanted to run our experiment with an enrichment of 62Ni, would it be cheaper to buy the lesser enriched Ni or buy a smaller amount of 96% and dilute it. The answer came back plain and simple - the cheapest is to buy the smaller amount of 96% and

RE: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!

2016-02-22 Thread Jones Beene
From: Bob Higgins > MFMP intends to find out by purchasing some 96% enriched 62Ni to run in a > Parkhomov-like reactor. The cost to purchase 96% enriched 62Ni is $11.30/mg > (milligram)… Bob – the thought just occurred, assuming that 62Ni is the only active isotope … and the others are

Re: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!

2016-02-22 Thread H LV
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > > Rossi is known to have purchased 62Ni a few years back from an isotope > producer. Also, another source claims to have provided some amount of 62Ni > to Rossi. So we know that Rossi obtained some 62Ni. This does

[Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!

2016-02-22 Thread Bob Cook
AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over! The Lugano report states that the ~1g of fuel was poured into the reactor. However, I am told that when the researchers were retrieving a sample of ash, it was firmly attached to the tube

[Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:

2016-02-22 Thread Bob Cook
RE: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:I have always assumed that the isotopic concentrations were due to various differential parameters, including magnetic field strengths, during their generation. It is generally assumed that supernovae product the display

Re: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!

2016-02-22 Thread Bob Higgins
-62 expense into account. There is not evidence that this is a > consideration to my knowledge. > > Bob Cook > > *From:* Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > *Sent:* Monday, February 22, 2016 8:17 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surpr

RE: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:

2016-02-22 Thread Jones Beene
From: Bob Cook * * What on earth make Ni-62 a good catalyst?. It would nice to at least to have a suggested catalytic mechanism… it is a singularity with the highest binding potential energy per nucleon of any nucleons. That means it’s stable. Yes, a lot of thought has gone

Re: [Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:

2016-02-22 Thread Bob Cook
RE: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:Eric and Bob Higgins comments comments on tests regarding the issue of Ni-62 can be found at the following Vortex-l thread: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:33:07 –0700 Bob Cook From: Bob Cook Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:59 AM

[Vo]:Re: the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:

2016-02-22 Thread Bob Cook
RE: [Vo]:the expected LENR Surprise Rossi's long time test over!Re:What on earth make Ni-62 a good catalyst?. It would nice to at least to have a suggested catalytic mechanism. As Jones notes, it is a singularity with the highest binding potential energy per nucleon of any nucleons