On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Look, suppose for the sake of argument you are right. Suppose the steam is
> much wetter than Galantini thought. It makes no difference! It cannot be
> so wet there is no anomalous heat.
>
But a small amount of anomalous heat is much less per
Jeff Driscoll wrote:
> > It said the equipment measures enthalpy. You can't do that unless you
> know
> > the quality of the steam. It also said that the instrument measures by
> mass,
> > not volume.
> > - Jed
> >
>
> It calculates the enthalpy of humid air based on the temperature and
> relat
2 matches
Mail list logo
