The main differences are between the modes of thinking and acting. Have you
read hat Piantelli says about the Scientific Method? This makes you reliable
and accountable
because if you make a hypothesis or a statement then it is
your obligation to demonstrate it by experiment(s)
A scientist does not
Daniel Rocha wrote:
But Focardi assited Rossi, just like he assited Piantelli. If people think
> Focardi could be fooled by a demonstration of huge power excess he could
> well be get wrong the measurment of a demonstration of low power excess.
I agree this does not make sense. I was only point
But Focardi assited Rossi, just like he assited Piantelli. If people think
Focardi could be fooled by a demonstration of huge power excess he could
well be get wrong the measurment of a demonstration of low power excess.
Daniel Rocha wrote:
I really do not understand why people trust Piantelli if they do not
trust Rossi.
Some reasons:
Piantelli has done better calorimetry than Rossi.
Piantelli has better academic credentials.
He has published peer-reviewed papers.
He does not publish a blog with inflammat
I really do not understand why people trust Piantelli if they do not trust
Rossi.
Here is an important link inside of Peter's web page, summarizing
progress by Piantelli:
http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/roy-virgilio-on-piantelli-plus-the-2008-piantelli-hypothesis/
- Jed
My dear Friends,
In his essay, Prof. Piantelli demonstrates that the Scientific
Experimental Method is a "sine qua non" condition for serious
research and discovery.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/08/scientific-values-of-professor.html
You will see later how he has done this in practice for
7 matches
Mail list logo
