Frank's work brings up a wish-list:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was an economical technology in existence
that had the ability to separate CO2 back into its individual
elements. Release the oxygen back into the atmosphere while
simultaneously nano-manufacturing all sorts of interesting carbon
OrionWorks wrote:
Frank's work brings up a wish-list:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was an economical technology in existence
that had the ability to separate CO2 back into its individual
elements. Release the oxygen back into the atmosphere while
simultaneously nano-manufacturing all
OrionWorks wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was an economical technology in existence
that had the ability to separate CO2 back into its individual
elements.
That would take as much energy as you get from burning the coal in
the first place. It would be useless, because if you have that
.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks [mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:09 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Sequestering CO2
Frank's work brings up a wish-list:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was an economical technology in existence
that had the ability
Actually what I said here was (probably) wrong. Sort of like saying you
can't get energy out of sugar in the absence of oxygen -- yeast would
laugh in your face if you claimed such a thing.
If we start with something like gasoline, which is something like C8H18
(pure octane, I know it's not, but
From Stephen:
OrionWorks wrote:
Frank's work brings up a wish-list:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was an economical technology in
existence that had the ability to separate CO2 back into its
individual elements. Release the oxygen back into the
atmosphere while simultaneously
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:09 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Sequestering CO2
Frank's work brings up a wish-list:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was an economical technology in existence
that had the ability to separate CO2 back into its individual
elements. Release the oxygen back
the faster they replicate. Well, isn't that cool? A self
regulating planet wide system is already in place to deal with the problem.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks [mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:09 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Sequestering
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:33:03 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
x*C8H18 + y*O2 -- z*Cw (some kind of graphite?) + q*H2O
Without spending time with redox tables or the equivalent I'm not
certain but I think the reaction is still energy-positive.
The reaction C8H18 +
In reply to OrionWorks's message of Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:35:49 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I would assume the O+H2 -- H2O -- O+H2 cycle is considered to be a
much more popular transport of energy. Obviously there has been a lot
more research into the latter cycle. Nevertheless, it would be
interesting to
10 matches
Mail list logo
