as far as I have enduerstood, CEA Grenble have replicated and checked
against more modern metrology.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LonchamptGreproducti.pdf
but maybe I miss a point
2012/9/16 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
At 09:25 PM 9/15/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
To refer to something in another post, sure, we can be pretty good at
engineering, but not necessarily when we don't understand how something is
working. That's what has been missing: an understanding of the
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
The scion of Toyota who started the program died of old age, and others
who were determined to stop it won out.
Perhaps.
Perhaps what? Perhaps he is still alive? Perhaps they were not determined
to close it down? They said they were!
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
I do not see that implication. To me, massive amounts of energy refers to
energy normalized to the mass of starting materials. For example, 50 MJ
from a few grams of cathode material plus water.
You may look at it that way . . .
No other
At 10:12 AM 9/15/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
If high energy density can be reliably created and sustained for
substantial periods, it is then intrinsically scalable, and it could be that.
It has been sustained for as
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Suppose an experiment is like tossing a coin (or a series of coins). Run a
lot of experiments, you might see a long series of some outcome. That
doesn't mean that you can control this.
Ordinarily, new scientific
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
They didn't necessarily create it, keep it stable. Perhaps it *stayed*
stable. There is, practically speaking, a huge difference.
You are wrong. The paper shows 3 out of 7 runs worked, but they did it
several other times not shown in the paper.
At 09:25 PM 9/15/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
They didn't necessarily create it, keep it stable. Perhaps it
*stayed* stable. There is, practically speaking, a huge difference.
You are wrong. The paper shows 3 out of 7
8 matches
Mail list logo
