Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-27 Thread Brian Ahern
nductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Hilmlid claims that his theory of Ultra dense hydrogen is based on the hole superconductor theory put forth by J. E. Hirsch<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fsearch%2Fcond-mat%3Fsearchtype%3Da

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Axil Axil
Hilmlid claims that his theory of Ultra dense hydrogen is based on the hole superconductor theory put forth by J. E. Hirsch . This theory is based to energy minimization and the theory of least action.

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:10:08 + (UTC): Hi, [snip] > Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais. >Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an >advanced civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case deluxe.

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread mixent
In reply to Brian Ahern's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:37:02 +: Hi, [snip] >He did consider both types. The maximum Tc was 240K. Don't we already have high TC superconductors with a higher TC? [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Brian Ahern
No. Positive charge carriers were not contemplated. From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:57 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Does the Keith Johnson model

RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit I apologize for the bombast. I was the DoD designated scientist to investigate high Tc in 1987. After interviewing many top theoretical physicists I settled on MIT professor, Keith Johnson. He had developed

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Brian Ahern
He did consider both types. The maximum Tc was 240K. From: Jones Beene Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 8:50 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Brian, According to Keith Johnson's

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Jones Beene
Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais. Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an advanced civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case deluxe. OTOH - the paper is just competent enough to be taken somewhat seriously, despite its lack

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Jones Beene
Brian, According to Keith Johnson's formalism, what is the highest Tc which is possible ? Did he consider both Type-I and Type-II ? Brian Ahern wrote: > Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small > number of scientists.

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Brian Ahern
Berry Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:45 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Thanks God! Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we just have to ask you! On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-25 Thread John Berry
> *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees > Fahrenheit > > https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf > <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechlinkcenter.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploa

RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-25 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
e: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Room temp SC is impossible From: Axil Axil Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit https://techlinkcenter.

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-25 Thread Brian Ahern
Room temp SC is impossible From: Axil Axil Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf<https://na

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-24 Thread Frank Znidarsic
Fraom my book The action of the transitional quantum states willnow be unveiled.  This author’s impedancematched interpretation of quantum physics describes the motion of the transitionquantum state.  Transverse atomicvibrations couple with the longitudinal nuclear speed during transition(22). 

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Frank Znidarsic
This is an amazing result that is relavent to LENR.  The fact that vibration can induce superconducivity. Vibrations normally destroys superconductivity; however, vibration at the right frequency inhances superconductivity. >From my book: pasted below. A low energy nuclear reactor (LENR) is

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Axil Axil
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/02/if-these-us-navy-patents-are-made-then-we-are-in-a-star-trek-technology-world.html This article mentions the *Gertsenshtein Effect*. https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1867254 A possible demonstration configuration of the Gertsenshtein Effect is

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Jones Beene
This is extremely interesting- since it describes a new approach to RTSC which is based on geometry and dynamic stimulation (mechanical vibration) in addition to the actual material involved. Joe Eck may have already offered a partial explanation based on work reported in 2017A New Phenomenon

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Ron Kita
Kudos Axil: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/02/if-these-us-navy-patents-are-made-then-we-are-in-a-star-trek-technology-world.html Perhaps..propulsion? Ron Kita http://www.chiralex.com On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:25 PM Axil Axil wrote: >

[Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-22 Thread Axil Axil
https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees