Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-27 Thread Brian Ahern 
I am very interested in this from a molecular orbital basis.
What is a hole?  Is it just an unfilled molecular orbital?  Is it "where the 
electrons ain't"?


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 3:23 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Hilmlid claims that his theory of Ultra dense hydrogen is based on the hole 
superconductor theory put forth by  J. E. 
Hirsch<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fsearch%2Fcond-mat%3Fsearchtype%3Dauthor%26query%3DHirsch%252C%2BJ%2BE=02%7C01%7C%7C9385bd06db644455409b08d69c285cca%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636868094499437783=5xQGTYbuQjm3So5tt4ym2CkpFvxnnpsmV3%2B%2Fn06Y6wU%3D=0>.
 This theory is based to energy minimization and the theory of least action.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09777<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1703.09777=02%7C01%7C%7C9385bd06db644455409b08d69c285cca%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636868094499447794=NBIBETMTsjaVce%2BbOQ4cXVDgy8x8sZ5uq6P%2F6uqE4Cc%3D=0>

Why only hole conductors can be superconductors
J. E. 
Hirsch<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fsearch%2Fcond-mat%3Fsearchtype%3Dauthor%26query%3DHirsch%252C%2BJ%2BE=02%7C01%7C%7C9385bd06db644455409b08d69c285cca%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636868094499457805=yUaEEm5sWStNJinoNrMo3GRCz9Ts3WrlKa7Gxccx6xo%3D=0>
(Submitted on 20 Mar 2017)
The conventional theory of superconductivity says that charge carriers in a 
metal that becomes superconducting can be either electrons or holes. I argue 
that this is incorrect. In order to satisfy conservation of mechanical momentum 
and of entropy of the universe in the superconductor to normal transition in 
the presence of a magnetic field it is necessary that the normal state charge 
carriers are holes. I will also review the empirical evidence in favor of the 
hypothesis that all superconductors are hole superconductors, and discuss the 
implications of this for the search for higher Tc   superconductors.

---

Another concept that might be in play in ultra dense hydrogen is nonequilibrium 
superconductivity through polaritons. Polaritons might take hold in the  
Bose-Fermi mixture formed by a cavity exciton-polariton condensate interacting 
with a two-dimensional electron system that forms on the surface of the ultra 
dense hydrogen electron cover layer.

In a nonequilibrium superconductor, the process of superconductivity is pumped 
through the input of energy like a laser and the maximum  temperature of 
formation of the  superconductor state is a function of the density  of 
polaritons in the polariton condensate and not from ambient temperature.




On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:10 AM Jones Beene 
mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais.

Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an advanced 
civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case deluxe. OTOH - the 
paper is just competent enough to be taken somewhat seriously, despite its lack 
of provenance.

https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2019-0869<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farc.aiaa.org%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.2514%2F6.2019-0869=02%7C01%7C%7C9385bd06db644455409b08d69c285cca%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636868094499467810=TIN7jBGz3C957rplzK1Y6MgmCt6eHXhYiQ1HjWluwn8%3D=0>

I'm thinking that Pais could have been one of the aliens recovered at Roswell 
who has finally been allowed to go public.. or ...

Think about the literal meaning of his name... not exactly MAGA but close and 
about as near to a spoof as the Navy could ever get at this high a level.



According to Keith Johnson's formalism, what is the highest Tc which is 
possible ?

Did he consider both Type-I and Type-II ?

Brian Ahern wrote:

> Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small 
> number of scientists.


https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fphys.org%252Fnews%252F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%2523jCp%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%257C1%257C0%257C636867639237122106%26sdata%3D%252B2pCBkSQctc22lySAr3w6GoifbBCngIlD751LdxYtBc%253D%26reserved%3D0=02%7C01%7C%7C9385bd06db644455409b08d69c285cca%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636868094499477815=W6%2ByWpUSY1oH5UoL0i4CnIczG4ZW5UO4IWLuKR0bpSU%3D=0>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Axil Axil 
Hilmlid claims that his theory of Ultra dense hydrogen is based on the hole
superconductor theory put forth by  J. E. Hirsch
.
This theory is based to energy minimization and the theory of least action.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09777

Why only hole conductors can be superconductors
J. E. Hirsch

(Submitted on 20 Mar 2017)

The conventional theory of superconductivity says that charge carriers in a
metal that becomes superconducting can be either electrons or holes. I
argue that this is incorrect. In order to satisfy conservation of
mechanical momentum and of entropy of the universe in the superconductor to
normal transition in the presence of a magnetic field it is necessary that
the normal state charge carriers are holes. I will also review the
empirical evidence in favor of the hypothesis that all superconductors are
hole superconductors, and discuss the implications of this for the search
for higher Tc   superconductors.

---

Another concept that might be in play in ultra dense hydrogen is
nonequilibrium superconductivity through polaritons. Polaritons might take
hold in the  Bose-Fermi mixture formed by a cavity exciton-polariton
condensate interacting with a two-dimensional electron system that forms on
the surface of the ultra dense hydrogen electron cover layer.

In a nonequilibrium superconductor, the process of superconductivity is
pumped through the input of energy like a laser and the maximum
temperature of formation of the  superconductor state is a function of the
density  of polaritons in the polariton condensate and not from ambient
temperature.





On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:10 AM Jones Beene  wrote:

> Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais.
>
> Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an
> advanced civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case
> deluxe. OTOH - the paper is just competent enough to be taken somewhat
> seriously, despite its lack of provenance.
>
> https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2019-0869
>
> I'm thinking that Pais could have been one of the aliens recovered at
> Roswell who has finally been allowed to go public.. or ...
>
> Think about the literal meaning of his name... not exactly MAGA but close
> and about as near to a spoof as the Navy could ever get at this high a
> level.
>
> 
>
> According to Keith Johnson's formalism, what is the highest Tc which is
> possible ?
>
> Did he consider both Type-I and Type-II ?
>
> Brian Ahern wrote:
>
> > Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a
> small number of scientists.
>
> --
>
> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp
> 
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread mixent 
In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:10:08 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
> Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais.
>Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an 
>advanced civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case deluxe. 
>OTOH - the paper is just competent enough to be taken somewhat seriously, 
>despite its lack of provenance. 
>
>https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2019-0869

This is the same thing that was in the patent application mentioned here a few
days ago. Does anyone know for a fact that it doesn't work?
[snip]
Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread mixent 
In reply to  Brian Ahern's message of Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:37:02 +:
Hi,
[snip]
>He did consider both types. The maximum Tc was 240K.

Don't we already have high TC superconductors with a higher TC?
[snip]
Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Brian Ahern 
No. Positive charge carriers were not contemplated.


From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:57 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit


Does the Keith Johnson model address POSITIVE charge carriers?



It sounds like electrons were considered in his model—what about protons—in a 
surface plasmonic array in a line of nano particles, each supporting its own 
plasma.



  Or maybe a  surface plasma of paired electron---Cooper paired electrons where 
the charge is spread out over the volume of the pair, but magnetic moments are  
acting along a line with respective moments anti- parallel along that line.  ( 
This may act like a composite BEC of zero spin, not affected by lattice 
resistance,  being a surface feature.)



https://phys.org/news/2019-01-evidence-superconductivity-room-temperature.html#nRlv<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-01-evidence-superconductivity-room-temperature.html%23nRlv=02%7C01%7C%7Cd569785e98d7465a78c808d69c0b7dc7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867970495565889=3k6QVqZbLYNoH%2FIOekWUQx44NNYHHogJwLWyuyCz7nA%3D=0>



https://phys.org/news/2014-06-superconducting-secrets-years.html#nRlv



Bob Cook

---


From: Brian Ahern 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 4:20:55 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

I apologize for the bombast.

I was the DoD designated scientist to investigate high Tc in 1987. After 
interviewing many top theoretical physicists I settled on MIT professor, Keith 
Johnson. He had developed a set of programs that evaluated all of the electron 
orbitals in a cluster of atoms. He could predict properties with a cluster of 
lessthan two dozen atoms.

The predictive abilities were astounding and he told the audience at the 1983 
Int. conference on SC in  Zurich that they should examine the Perovskite 
minerals to increase Tc.  Apparently,  Alex Mueller (the conference chairman) 
listened and directed his colleague, Bednors to follow up. He did so.

They won the Nobel Prize in 1987 and they are still clueless as to the 
mechanism.

Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small 
number of scientists.


From: John Berry 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Thanks God!  Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we 
just have to ask you!

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern 
mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:
Room temp SC is impossible


From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Ftechlinkcenter.org%252Fwp-content%252Fuploads%252F2019%252F02%252FRTSC.pdf%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%257C1%257C0%257C636867639237112098%26sdata%3DOX%252Ff%252BDuKg70ZFqL4qOEub7tkjgngbrNXxPIqhbVKNKQ%253D%26reserved%3D0=02%7C01%7C%7Cd569785e98d7465a78c808d69c0b7dc7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867970495575888=lpAgpplWCL3FVRdgVITac7k%2BJrVDqNJlSPzhsMlDmpw%3D=0>

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor 
capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees 
Fahrenheit.

Read more at: 
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fphys.org%252Fnews%252F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%2523jCp%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%257C1%257C0%257C636867639237122106%26sdata%3D%252B2pCBkSQctc22lySAr3w6GoifbBCngIlD751LdxYtBc%253D%26reserved%3D0=02%7C01%7C%7Cd569785e98d7465a78c808d69c0b7dc7%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867970495585900=R1N3MQt3XVHzBhRVr4M2fyOq6I27mdpu1XxwtKWdSvQ%3D=0>

RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com 
Does the Keith Johnson model address POSITIVE charge carriers?

It sounds like electrons were considered in his model—what about protons—in a 
surface plasmonic array in a line of nano particles, each supporting its own 
plasma.

  Or maybe a  surface plasma of paired electron---Cooper paired electrons where 
the charge is spread out over the volume of the pair, but magnetic moments are  
acting along a line with respective moments anti- parallel along that line.  ( 
This may act like a composite BEC of zero spin, not affected by lattice 
resistance,  being a surface feature.)

https://phys.org/news/2019-01-evidence-superconductivity-room-temperature.html#nRlv

https://phys.org/news/2014-06-superconducting-secrets-years.html#nRlv

Bob Cook
---

From: Brian Ahern 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 4:20:55 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

I apologize for the bombast.

I was the DoD designated scientist to investigate high Tc in 1987. After 
interviewing many top theoretical physicists I settled on MIT professor, Keith 
Johnson. He had developed a set of programs that evaluated all of the electron 
orbitals in a cluster of atoms. He could predict properties with a cluster of 
lessthan two dozen atoms.

The predictive abilities were astounding and he told the audience at the 1983 
Int. conference on SC in  Zurich that they should examine the Perovskite 
minerals to increase Tc.  Apparently,  Alex Mueller (the conference chairman) 
listened and directed his colleague, Bednors to follow up. He did so.

They won the Nobel Prize in 1987 and they are still clueless as to the 
mechanism.

Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small 
number of scientists.


From: John Berry 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Thanks God!  Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we 
just have to ask you!

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern 
mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:
Room temp SC is impossible


From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechlinkcenter.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FRTSC.pdf=02%7C01%7C%7Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867639237112098=OX%2Ff%2BDuKg70ZFqL4qOEub7tkjgngbrNXxPIqhbVKNKQ%3D=0>

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor 
capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees 
Fahrenheit.

Read more at: 
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%23jCp=02%7C01%7C%7Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867639237122106=%2B2pCBkSQctc22lySAr3w6GoifbBCngIlD751LdxYtBc%3D=0>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Brian Ahern 
He did consider both types. The maximum Tc was 240K.


From: Jones Beene 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 8:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Brian,

According to Keith Johnson's formalism, what is the highest Tc which is 
possible ?

Did he consider both Type-I and Type-II ?


Brian Ahern wrote:

> Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small 
> number of scientists.


https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fphys.org%252Fnews%252F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%2523jCp%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%257C1%257C0%257C636867639237122106%26sdata%3D%252B2pCBkSQctc22lySAr3w6GoifbBCngIlD751LdxYtBc%253D%26reserved%3D0=02%7C01%7C%7C788677f4ca454bfd7af108d69bf16355%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867858384426052=0vSJ8IX%2B0v185vPSs1dlo79CA%2Br0JZg2ywImLyq1z2I%3D=0>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Jones Beene 
 Here is another paper by the inventor Salvatore Pais.
Initially, this makes one wonder if either Dr Pais is an alien from an advanced 
civilization, a collection of Navy jokesters, or a nut-case deluxe. OTOH - the 
paper is just competent enough to be taken somewhat seriously, despite its lack 
of provenance. 

https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2019-0869
I'm thinking that Pais could have been one of the aliens recovered at Roswell 
who has finally been allowed to go public.. or ...

Think about the literal meaning of his name... not exactly MAGA but close and 
about as near to a spoof as the Navy could ever get at this high a level.


According to Keith Johnson's formalism, what is the highest Tc which is 
possible ? 

Did he consider both Type-I and Type-II ? 

 Brian Ahern wrote: 
 > Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small 
 > number of scientists.

https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Jones Beene 
 Brian,
According to Keith Johnson's formalism, what is the highest Tc which is 
possible ? 

Did he consider both Type-I and Type-II ? 


 Brian Ahern wrote: 
 > Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small 
 > number of scientists.

https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-26 Thread Brian Ahern 
I apologize for the bombast.

I was the DoD designated scientist to investigate high Tc in 1987. After 
interviewing many top theoretical physicists I settled on MIT professor, Keith 
Johnson. He had developed a set of programs that evaluated all of the electron 
orbitals in a cluster of atoms. He could predict properties with a cluster of 
lessthan two dozen atoms.

The predictive abilities were astounding and he told the audience at the 1983 
Int. conference on SC in  Zurich that they should examine the Perovskite 
minerals to increase Tc.  Apparently,  Alex Mueller (the conference chairman) 
listened and directed his colleague, Bednors to follow up. He did so.

They won the Nobel Prize in 1987 and they are still clueless as to the 
mechanism.

Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small 
number of scientists.


From: John Berry 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Thanks God!  Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we 
just have to ask you!

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern 
mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:
Room temp SC is impossible


From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechlinkcenter.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FRTSC.pdf=02%7C01%7C%7Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867639237112098=OX%2Ff%2BDuKg70ZFqL4qOEub7tkjgngbrNXxPIqhbVKNKQ%3D=0>

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor 
capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees 
Fahrenheit.

Read more at: 
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%23jCp=02%7C01%7C%7Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636867639237122106=%2B2pCBkSQctc22lySAr3w6GoifbBCngIlD751LdxYtBc%3D=0>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-25 Thread John Berry 
Thanks God!  Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we
just have to ask you!

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern  wrote:

> Room temp SC is impossible
>
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil 
> *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees
> Fahrenheit
>
> https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechlinkcenter.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FRTSC.pdf=02%7C01%7C%7Cc368491ab7aa4f039d7208d69946f8ee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636864927427172322=pm41B5f778Ikcs%2BdZkn4fMoU27QCAm%2FZhE1czsfQntA%3D=0>
>
> The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and
> Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature
> superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of
> around 77 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
> Read more at:
> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%23jCp=02%7C01%7C%7Cc368491ab7aa4f039d7208d69946f8ee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636864927427182314=Pl8PmFBs6xrfxekVfWi4OFs2Sy7WQj2DGw638UX4qho%3D=0>
>

RE: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-25 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com 
Brian—

Your comment seems a little dogmatic IMHO.

Bob Cook

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10


From: Brian Ahern 
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 2:57:20 AM
To: Axil Axil; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Room temp SC is impossible


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechlinkcenter.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FRTSC.pdf=02%7C01%7C%7Cc368491ab7aa4f039d7208d69946f8ee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636864927427172322=pm41B5f778Ikcs%2BdZkn4fMoU27QCAm%2FZhE1czsfQntA%3D=0>

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor 
capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees 
Fahrenheit.

Read more at: 
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%23jCp=02%7C01%7C%7Cc368491ab7aa4f039d7208d69946f8ee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636864927427182314=Pl8PmFBs6xrfxekVfWi4OFs2Sy7WQj2DGw638UX4qho%3D=0>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-25 Thread Brian Ahern 
Room temp SC is impossible


From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechlinkcenter.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FRTSC.pdf=02%7C01%7C%7Cc368491ab7aa4f039d7208d69946f8ee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636864927427172322=pm41B5f778Ikcs%2BdZkn4fMoU27QCAm%2FZhE1czsfQntA%3D=0>

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and 
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor 
capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees 
Fahrenheit.

Read more at: 
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%23jCp=02%7C01%7C%7Cc368491ab7aa4f039d7208d69946f8ee%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636864927427182314=Pl8PmFBs6xrfxekVfWi4OFs2Sy7WQj2DGw638UX4qho%3D=0>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-24 Thread Frank Znidarsic 
Fraom my book
The action of the transitional quantum states willnow be unveiled.  This 
author’s impedancematched interpretation of quantum physics describes the 
motion of the transitionquantum state.  Transverse atomicvibrations couple with 
the longitudinal nuclear speed during transition(22).  This multi-force-field 
actionopens a channel of matching impedance and emits a photon.  Chemically 
assisted nuclear reactions are inducedby an intense vibration at this frequency.



Frank Znidarsic

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Frank Znidarsic 
This is an amazing result that is relavent to LENR.  The fact that vibration 
can induce superconducivity.
Vibrations normally destroys superconductivity; however, vibration at the right 
frequency inhances superconductivity.
>From my book: pasted below.
A low energy nuclear reactor (LENR) is constructedof palladium or nickel.  
Hydrogen isdriven into the metal.  The dissolvedhydrogen is not bound.  It is, 
however,confined at the extent of the nano-particle. The metallic lattice 
naturally resonates at thermal frequencies (1012hz).  This vibration is 
enhanced withheat, laser light, or radio waves. Nanometer scaled domains couple 
strongly with the external stimulation.35  

Typically, vibration destroyssuperconductivity.  This author’sanalysis has 
shown that vibration, at a dimensional frequency of onemegahertz-meter, 
enhances superconductivity36.  This effect was experimentally confirmed atthe 
max Planck institute in 201441. 


“Terahertz-frequency(1012 hz) optical pulses can … induce superconductivity”.

Roman Mankowsky, The MaxPlanck Institute41


Vibration can reinforce an electronic condensate andinduce a warm, above room 
temperature, superconductivity.  This vibration can also adjoin 
non-boundprotons to the condensate.  In thegravitomagnetic devices, a lower 
frequency radio frequency of vibration (106hz) is transferred to the 
loosely-bound heavy nucleons that rest between thelayers of a superconductive 
disk.  Thesevibrationally reinforced condensates are a new state of matter.  
The composite state is reminiscent of J.J.Thompson’s “plumb pudding” model of 
matter. 



Low energy thermal vibration has a high energyeffect at the scale of these 
condensed nano-domains.  The stimulation imposes a speed of 1,093,850meters 
across a cluster of nucleons.  Theaction drives the electromagnetic, 
gravitomagnetic, and the nuclear magneticspin orbit force to the surface of the 
nano-domain.  The system enters into a state of continuous quantumtransition. 
“The constants of the motion tend toward those of the electromagnetic” 
and the reaction proceeds.

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Axil Axil 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/02/if-these-us-navy-patents-are-made-then-we-are-in-a-star-trek-technology-world.html

This article mentions the *Gertsenshtein Effect*.

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1867254

A possible demonstration configuration of the Gertsenshtein
Effect is analyzed. In 1960, using only General Relativity, the Russian
theorist M. E. Gertsenshtein described the revolutionary concept that light
passing through a strong magnetic field will produce a gravitational wave
via wave resonance. The generation and control of gravitational waves would
enable significant and dramatic advances in space communication and
propulsion. Such advances would be highly valuable to the human and robotic
exploration of space. This paper focuses on one method for a near term
demonstration of the Gertsenshtein Effect using system components that are
within the current state of the art. Light sources such as X‐ray lasers and
synchrotrons are investigated for suitability. Pulsed light sources may
strengthen the effect, as will inhomogeneous index targets, which have also
been predicted to strengthen the conversion efficiency to gravitational
waves (GW). Various sources of strong magnetic fields are also investigated
since this is a requirement for the Gertsenshtein Effect. While a DC field
is the baseline, AC magnetic fields are also explored as they may act to
provide a source of modulation for the effect in the case of a continuous
wave light source. A number of existing GW detectors are reviewed in the
context of how they could be applied to measuring the gravitational waves
produced by the Gertsenshtein Effect.

This effect is related to what is going on in LENR. Some of the major
effects of the LENR reaction(but not all) are based on the spins of photons
confined in a vortex.

Furthermore in another connection, General relativity generates gravity
increase in a rotating frame of reference. In a recent experiment there was
an increase in gravity of one billion times that of gravity on the Earth
surface on the surface of a rotating micro ball of calcium spinning at
600,000 RPMs.

https://www.livescience.com/39275-fastest-manmade-spinning-object-made.html

 In this regard, a connection between LENR and anti gravity begin to
appear. This connection might be symmetric in that a rapidly spinning
object begins to produce LENR  and anti- gravity effects.

Such a connect is seen in  strange radiation data from Russia, which seems
to be linked with LENR, and one of the most intriguing results is that it
is also possible to produce strange radiation near small disks spinning
very fast.

On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 8:47 AM Ron Kita  wrote:

> Kudos Axil:
> https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/02/if-these-us-navy-patents-are-made-then-we-are-in-a-star-trek-technology-world.html
> Perhaps..propulsion?  Ron Kita http://www.chiralex.com
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:25 PM Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf
>>
>> The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent
>> and Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature
>> superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of
>> around 77 degrees Fahrenheit.
>>
>> Read more at:
>> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp
>>
>

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Jones Beene 
 This is extremely interesting- since it describes a new approach to RTSC which 
is based on geometry and dynamic stimulation (mechanical vibration) in addition 
to the actual material involved.
Joe Eck may have already offered a partial explanation based on work reported 
in 2017A New Phenomenon in the Physical Sciences


| 
| 
|  | 
A New Phenomenon in the Physical Sciences


 |

 |

 |




Axil Axil wrote:
The Navy's patent application... describing a plasmonic based room-temperature 
superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of 
around 77 degrees Fahrenheit. 

Read more at:Navy files for patent on room-temperature superconductor


| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
Navy files for patent on room-temperature superconductor

A scientist working for the U.S. Navy has filed for a patent on a 
room-temperature superconductor, representing ...
 |

 |

 |






 

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-23 Thread Ron Kita 
Kudos Axil:
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2019/02/if-these-us-navy-patents-are-made-then-we-are-in-a-star-trek-technology-world.html
Perhaps..propulsion?  Ron Kita http://www.chiralex.com


On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:25 PM Axil Axil  wrote:

> https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf
>
> The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and
> Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature
> superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of
> around 77 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
> Read more at:
> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp
>

[Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

2019-02-22 Thread Axil Axil 
https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf

The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature
superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of
around 77 degrees Fahrenheit.

Read more at:
https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp