On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Look at Kim Kardashian who has made $35 million just by being famous, with
> no apparent assets other than her ass.
Jed,
Might I suggest that you look a bit higher?
T
On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
«LENR is another avenue. It's not just about Rossi. If the Rossi
thing doesn't happen, then maybe something else will. Rossi has
brought a lot of attention to the field. Any researchers who have a
legitimate claim are going to benefit fro
Susan Gipp wrote:
Jed, how many words wasted !
Just recall how Rossi reacted, time ago, when you proposed to make a
test in Bologna using your own tools and what he said when you asked
him to visit his Florida plant !
Didn't any alarm bell ring ?
Yes, as I have said again and again, if we a
Jed, how many words wasted !
Just recall how Rossi reacted, time ago, when you proposed to make a test in
Bologna using your own tools and what he said when you asked him to visit
his Florida plant !
Didn't any alarm bell ring ?
I'm sure you are, in his opinion, one of the very very very whatever b
Horace Heffner wrote:
It is not primarily the people competent in this field that stand to
be cheated if Rossi's device is a fraud or self deception. There are
plenty of people with a lot of money who are scientifically clueless.
These are the kind of people that can be suckered in by
scien
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
If Rossi turns out to be a fraud, or hugely mistaken for some reason,
the skeptics here will deserve no credit for predicting this.
Getting a little defensive, are we, Jed?
No, but I am sick of people who play it safe by predicting failure where
failure is likely.
On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Brief public demos have been repeated 4 times in 8 months, I think.
That is a small number. Anyone would invest in this based on those
demos would be insane, in my opinion.
I am glad we agree on at least some aspect of this.
On Aug 25, 20
That's a good publicity...
On 11-08-25 01:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
If Rossi turns out to be a fraud, or hugely mistaken for some reason,
the skeptics here will deserve no credit for predicting this.
Getting a little defensive, are we, Jed?
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
«LENR is another avenue. It's not just about Rossi. If the Rossi thing
doesn't happen, then maybe something else will. Rossi has brought a
lot of attention to the field. Any researchers who have a legitimate
claim are going to benefit from this.»
–Michael A. Nelson, Nasa
«LENR is another avenue. It's not just about Rossi. If the Rossi thing
doesn't happen, then maybe something else will. Rossi has brought a lot of
attention to the field. Any researchers who have a legitimate claim are
going to benefit from this.»
–Michael A. Nelson, Nasa
On Aug 25, 2011 8:57 PM, "J
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Pretty much the total destruction of all confidence I have in LENR. If so
> many competent people in the field were cheated that easily by Rossi, I can
> expect much worse from everyone, even in the sense of self deception.
Some questions:
How many competent people in the f
Robert Parks will be, once again, smug as a bug.
Frank Z
-Original Message-
From: Mattia Rizzi
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thu, Aug 25, 2011 7:26 am
Subject: [Vo]:The day after Rossi
What will happen after Rossi’s Energy Catalyzer will be proved as a hoax?
We will ever seen the “rossi
Pretty much the total destruction of all confidence I have in LENR. If so
many competent people in the field were cheated that easily by Rossi, I can
expect much worse from everyone, even in the sense of self deception.
I have answered this question yesterday on my blog.
and have announced it here.
Not the end of the world, not the end of LENR
Peter
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
> What will happen after Rossi’s Energy Catalyzer will be proved as a
> hoax?
> We will ever seen the “rossi-
What will happen after Rossi’s Energy Catalyzer will be proved as a hoax?
We will ever seen the “rossi-belivers”?
We will see lenr-canr website closed, after this stomach punch?
We will see cold fusion researchers stop doing sloppy calorimetry and focusing
more on STRONG nuclear radiations before
16 matches
Mail list logo