Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
An individual fat-Cat may run longer than 4 hours on the average run, and he
probably expected at least 8 hours based on the original time schedule. But
also - it was clear (to a few of us) that Rossi had most likely faced this
exact problem before (rapid
The answer to your question can be given only by experiment. Rossi claims
his system is absolutely different
from all the other LENRs so what happens in an Arata Cell is not valid for
the E-cat.
It is now the time Rossi should predict the duration of the
1 MW demo- and this cannot be a few hours.
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer to your question can be given only by experiment.
I gather the question being: Will this system run indefinitely without
input power? Indefinitely is an indefinite description, meaning I do not
know how long it might run. There is no question
I agree with what you say, however I cannot believe
the story of the factory heated with such an generator.
Actually it was a lot of involution in E-cats from the start till now (e.g.
O/U from a spectacular 200:1 to a modest 6;1, power form 12 to 3 kW) but so
much regress is not believable.
Peter
Jed
I find the heat after death nomenclature to be a bit weird. I think Rossi's self sustaining
mode is more descriptive. Any idea where heat after death originated?
Ron
--On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 11:02 AM -0400 Jed Rothwell
jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Gluck
Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote:
I find the heat after death nomenclature to be a bit weird.
It is a bit weird. I use it from force of habit.
There is some benefit to preserving technical terminology with
peculiar etymology or mistaken etymology: you can look up the early papers
on the
6 matches
Mail list logo
