On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:47 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Guys, this thread has gotten very far off the subject. I request that you
rename it and continue. I would really appreciate a discussion concerning
tritium associated with Ni-H LENR.
Dave
We seem to be reaching the
: Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tritium in Ni-H LENR
Sorry I opened this can of worms. One response only:
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, centuries after Darwin, other people have indeed found an organ
that
could not possibly have been formed by numerous
Von: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 21:58 Freitag, 25.Mai 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Tritium in Ni-H LENR
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Kuhn understood that scientists
re 'Yeomen' -- Eric and James
2nd take
Yeomen, as
I understand the term, are a group of people having enough material and
educational resources to be 'free thinkers'.
The
question is:
Are these
people decisive wrt the advancement of humanity?
I think
not.
They play a
certain role, but
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com
wrote:
In the early middle ages it was the church-builders, which advanced the
art of empirical construction of large buildings by trial and error. Lots
of churches had to be repaired or collapsed altogether.
Those
___
Von: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Paracelsus whose motto was: Let no man belong to another that can belong to
himself.
James,
I understand this as a typical statement of a renaissance mind.
But: Paracelsus was not a Yeoman.
He was driven by his
The definition of Yeoman is at issue. Its modern degeneration has
virtually nothing to do with the original notion. Basically there was,
once upon a time, recognition of the foundation of civilization --
primarily because civilization had only recently arisen. This is
particularly true of
I would think the idea that one can take land to support a mate is
agricultural notion of identity and integrity.
Harry
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The definition of Yeoman is at issue. Its modern degeneration has
virtually nothing to do with the
in Ni-H LENR
The definition of Yeoman is at issue. Its modern degeneration has
virtually nothing to do with the original notion. Basically there was,
once upon a time, recognition of the foundation of civilization --
primarily because civilization had only recently arisen
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think the idea that one can take land to support a mate is
agricultural notion of identity and integrity.
Is sexual notion of identity and integrity.
You know nothing of animal behavior.
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Guenter Wildgruber
gwildgru...@ymail.comwrote:
James,
thank you for Your sensible comment.
I did not know about the term 'allodium'.
looking after the term, I read:
...
True allodial title is rare, with most property ownership in the common
law
...@ymail.com
Cc: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, May 26, 2012 10:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tritium in Ni-H LENR
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com
wrote:
James,
thank you for Your sensible comment.
I did not know about the term 'allodium'.
looking
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:03 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think the idea that one can take land to support a mate is
agricultural notion of identity and integrity.
Is sexual notion of identity
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Kuhn understood that scientists are emotional creatures, given to biases
and fads of various kinds, and that this makes even the hard sciences an
eminently social endeavor.
Its far worse than Kuhn indicates. He
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason this is far worse than Kuhn indicates is that it is entirely
conceivable that such financial dependence could enslave generation after
generation of scientists.
I don't know about generations. Peter Hagelstein told me the problem has
gotten
I find your attempt to equate Darwin with Newton rather amusing.
If there ever was a field of pseudoscience, that is beholden to and extremely
malleable to political pressure; it is the field that Darwin created with his
swiss-cheese theory.
While Newton created whole fields of legitimate
Sorry I opened this can of worms. One response only:
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, centuries after Darwin, other people have indeed found an organ that
could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight
modifications. The bacterial flagellum is one. The organ
This link provides a nice concise summary of evolutionary thought from
the Greeks to the victorian age.
http://library.thinkquest.org/C004367/eh1.shtml
Darwin's account of evolution is over emphasized, but that doesn't
mean it is worthless. Although the link says Lamarckian evolution has
been
cold fusion; my
challenge to you is - Are you prepared to look at the science behind the
movement against Darwinian Evolution?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tritium in Ni-H LENR
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tritium in Ni-H LENR
Sorry I opened this can of worms. One response only:
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, centuries after Darwin, other people have indeed found an organ that
could not possibly have
This may be too open-ended and nebulous to present at this juncture - but
the evidence for small amounts of tritium in Ni-H LERN is substantial.
Thanks to Ed Storms and Jed Rothwell from bringing this detail clearly into
focus recently - because for one overriding consideration- given the rarity
I should credit Eric Walker's persistence, as well, in this mini tritium
revival - especially in digging up old papers from the early nineties where
the isotope is mentioned.
There are many other papers as well, some of them not available on
LENR/CANR. Fusion Technology is a good resource for
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Tritium is so extremely rare and unexpected, and its detection is so
certain
and reliable - that even its occasional appearance overrides EVERY AND ALL
of the skeptics objections which are mostly all associated with low
reproducibility.
I have often
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
After I describe the people at BARC and Jalbert, the discussion ends. I do
not recall any instances in which the skeptics responded. However, in other
venues and discussions they continue to say they do not believe the
I wrote:
I have often said this, but the skeptics disagree. They find reasons to
doubt the results.
There is a legitimate reason to doubt results with heavy water. Some heavy
water does have tritium in it to start with. This can be concentrated by
electrolysis. Experts such as Storms know
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I should credit Eric Walker's persistence, as well, in this mini tritium
revival - especially in digging up old papers from the early nineties
where
the isotope is mentioned.
I failed to give Ed Storms credit for the
26 matches
Mail list logo
