If anyone is sitting on their hands, and is looking for a challenge, it may be time to begin construction on a Wikipedia entry for Defkalion Green Technologies. Such an entry needs to be entirely confined to reliable sources (e.g., Republic of Greece, Government Gazette, 4 April 2011; Greek newspapers; mainstream news outlets (not just their blogs); NO "free energy" sites)
See Wikipedia: Notability(organizations and companies): An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it. To avoid the disarray that is the wiki Energy_Catalyzer entry, a straightforward example, avoiding WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, would entail the company's creation, Praxen parent, and corporate headquarters (which we know has been visited by third parties). Any mention of the Hyperion (if there needs to be any) would need to be extremely concise, state openly that it has not been independently verified (yet), completely avoid talk of underlying principles, and I'd recommend leaving any questionable material on the "talk" pages until independent testing is completed. The notoriety of Defkalion is currently based on speculation of future impact (and a Board of Direectors that consists of some interesting people). This is why a simple "corporate info" page can be set now as a "bookmark", and the Hyperion data can be moved from "discussion" to the "main mage" contingent upon the testing at the end of this month. As for now, let's stick to the facts. Any pushback from Wikipedia moderators/editors is not a concerted effort to silence new energy, but more likely a genuine belief that DGT do not currently meet the necessary qualifications for Wikipedia: Notability (above). This is why it is VERY important to leave any speculation in draft form in discussion pages. Do not (no, really) treat the discussion section as a forum to argue the merits of cold fusion. At the end of January, Defkalion verified that two members of their BoD have changed since July 2011. This will be published in the Greek Government Gazette, but I have been unable to find a copy dated after mid-January to check. Once we have a Wikipedia entry started, they may be more forthcoming with corporate details. Best, R.L. Note: The reliable sources may refer to Defkalion as "ΔΕΥΚΑΛΙΩΝ−ΠΡΑΣΙΝΕΣ ΤΕΧΝΟΛΟΓΙΕΣ", or equivalent. (http://www.et.gr/idocs-nph/search/fekAeEpeForm.html?args=ghPriTbqMLO1KL8YLjv4MblPftDoqEuJ5N0HUtBAxOX7SbR6Q7-y5HuAEP5mMG8HbpDiIXIxcVX8UqWb_zFijE2LC0GwoJ8mFjUcTxKNsKPAajKm-t06xeV1nojoUnjs)
