In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:44:23 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
This was not an MeV/He-4 chart, actually, and it was not, contrary to
Krivit's assertions, used to prove the 24 MeV correlation. What the
paper was asserting was that there was a correlation between excess
At 04:55 PM 2/8/2010, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:44:23 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
This was not an MeV/He-4 chart, actually, and it was not, contrary to
Krivit's assertions, used to prove the 24 MeV correlation. What the
paper was asserting
On Jan 31, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
On Jan 31, 2010, at 1:12 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
I'm encouraged to see that debate concerning the pros and cons of the
controversial Widom Larsen theory has started opening up. I expect
I'm encouraged to see that debate concerning the pros and cons of the
controversial Widom Larsen theory has started opening up. I expect to see
disagreement and controversy.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/WL/2009Jan30LatticeEnergySlides.pdf
From Abd,
...
And the kicker: in the above slide
On Jan 31, 2010, at 1:12 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net
wrote:
I'm encouraged to see that debate concerning the pros and cons of the
controversial Widom Larsen theory has started opening up. I expect
to seecontroversy.
Controversy and especially reasoned
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/342incoherentexplanation.shtml
I've read this issue of New Energy Times and am
puzzled. Krivit rejects the hypothesis, it
appears, that helium collection in these
experiments is not complete, that some helium
remains in the system and is not
6 matches
Mail list logo
