The following calculations
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DecayCurve1.pdf
show the thermal decline curve for the case:
5Mass (kg)
748 Thermal Power (w) for powered equilibrium
600 Mass Temp. (°C) at powered equilibrium = T0
1484.9 Thermal Decay Time Constant (s) = Tau
taken from mode 3, line 3, of:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/RossiThermal2.pdf
This demonstrates the cutoff occurs at the temperature at which all
power is going to merely heating the water, with none left to boil
the water.
On Aug 28, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
In the Corrections to heat after death calculations I posted
values assuming a flow rate of 7 liters per hour:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/RossiThermal.pdf
However, Mattia Rizzi made a sound argument for a flow rate of 3
liters per hour, or about 0.83 g/s, for the Krivit demo, in his post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg50685.html
There is thus a good possibility this setting was used in other
tests. If true then the feasibility of a 15 minute heat after
death observation without any excess (nuclear) heat being provided
looks far more feasible. See:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/RossiThermal2.pdf
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
