In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 28 Aug 2015 01:55:26 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the details
>of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's world app:
>
>http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/08/27/industrial-heat-files-new-interna
From: Terry Blanton
PDF version:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBeUdnZkprSlhPTWs/view?usp=sharing
Ø Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the details
of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's …
One detail which seems to be missing is
Although he didn't test the dogbones until high temperatures, Rossi did use
the emissivity temperatures for alumina contained in the literature, which
correctly corresponded to the dogbones at low temperatures.
So, at least it was a better analysis than the 32 day test on Upsala.
2015-08-28 3:15
PDF version:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBeUdnZkprSlhPTWs/view?usp=sharing
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the
> details of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's world app:
>
>
>
Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the details
of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's world app:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/08/27/industrial-heat-files-new-international-patent-for-energy-producing-reaction-devices/
From: Axil Axil
Who was awarded the potassium patent or was it deemed by Rossi and his legal
team to be open source.
Thermacore held that patent but it has expired, so yes - it is in the public
domain.
Jones
In one important way, Rossi's catalytic approach is more powerful than that
of Pekka Soininen. Rossi uses up to 100 micron nickel particles which are
sintered together from 5 micron COTS powder. The EMF power application that
these particles produce is proportional to the SIZE SPREAD of the partic
>From MFMP as follows:
@Ecco
Filing date Nov 27, 2012
Priority date Nov 27, 2011
Also published as US20150162104, WO2013076378A2, WO2013076378A3
Inventors Pekka Soininen
>From this patent
https://www.google.com/patents/EP2783369A2?cl=en
[0116] In an embodiment of the present invention styrene
Rossi said that the COP of the mouse is (1.1). The mouse must produce
meson, muons and other subatomic particles via induced rydberg matter that
reacts with the Cats that surround it to induce a LENR based chain reaction
inside the Cats.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:46 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Rossi
Rossi has talked about a Mouse to go with the E-Cat but we haven't seen
one yet. I'm guessing this is probably a very small E-Cat that
supplies heat in a controlled way to the main E-Cat.
Strange how all my comments end up at the bottom of the list. This
makes it difficult to follow the con
Who was awarded the potassium patent or was it deemed by Rossi and his
legal team to be open source. Rossi's low heat reactor (1 Megawatt version)
must use a potassium based fuel. A Lithium based fuel must run in a reactor
with and operating temperature of over 1000C. Is Rossi conceding the Big
cat
I have the opinion that patents are just costly and a way for patent
lawyers to suck money out of inventors.. It really does not protect. Read
Jones's idea about how the fight about the right claim is already in full
swing and they are lawyering up. Another thing is that I think another way
to re
Jones,
Further to what you wrote, Rossi's stated plan is to win the commercial
battle by selling first, selling it so cheaply it is not worth competing
with the "name" brand. In order to do this he has to have a patent to
protect against others stopping him through their patents. The court
b
From: Blaze Spinnaker
6)Randell Mills has been on record for well over one year as saying that
“LiAlH4 + Ni as a hydrogen dissociator run at elevated temperature is disclosed
in my patents.” [filed in Russia and the USA.]
It is likely that Rossi’s disclosure would otherwise fit into the
>
> 6)Randell Mills has been on record for well over one year as saying
> that “LiAlH4 + Ni as a hydrogen dissociator run at elevated temperature is
> disclosed in my patents.” [filed in Russia and the USA.]
>
>
>
> It is likely that Rossi’s disclosure would otherwise fit into the category
> o
Let’s connect the dots in the Rossi patent as it fits into the big picture
(while looking for even larger implications):
1)The Claim set is very narrow, and that is risky but expedient.
2)The only protection found in this disclosure is for lithium hydride in
combination with aluminu
Peter and Jones,
Rossi has recently stated he is working on 64 more patents. I suspect
this first patent was driven by the desire to get something patented.
The US Patent Office is dead set against cold fusion and you probably
noticed neither cold fusion nor LENR were mentioned, but rather it
From: Peter Gluck
Ø Rossi has no competition, makes the rules, leads- so this patent was
necessary and is useful.
It may be useful, but is difficult to imagine Rossi as leading the pack, with
this as his flagship patent. The claims are very narrow, and that is very
risky.
BTW here
I have worked many years with patents so I dare to say that I know the
lesson
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/aug-26-how-valuable-is-rossis-us-patent.html
Know-how is more than patents. a complex technology as LENR needs more
patents.
Rosssi has no competition, makes the rules, leads- so
19 matches
Mail list logo