Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
Eric, et al, The momentum/energy kick exerted on a charged particle can be calculated using the formula provided by Feynman (vol. 3, equation (21.16)), or by Barbieri, et al (p.6, equation (27)) - It is the time integral of the induced electric field E = -dA/dt = the time derivative of the magnetic vector potential caused when current/magnetic field strength changes. (integrated over the time interval of the change) As Feynman notes - The electric field is enormous if the flux is changing rapidly, and it gives a force on the particle. [1] Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. 3, Ch. 21 http://www.peaceone.net/basic/Feynman/V3%20Ch21.pdf [2] An educational path for the magnetic vector potential and its physical implications http://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.5619.pdf In some nano-circuits and plasma arcs, a huge field is generated. - LP Eric Walker wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: -Original Message- From: Nigel Dyer I'm intrigued by the 'fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers' comment. ... Nigel This could be a reference to nuclear transmutation associated with high voltage power lines. ... Yes, that sounds right -- thanks Jones. I didn't remember that detail veryaccurately. In my head the concepts high voltage power line and transmutation became transformer and fusion. I would not have made a very good journalist. Eric
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
I'm intrigued by the 'fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers' comment. I've had a quick scan on your blog, and a search through the vortex-l archive, and a search in the web and cant find anything obvious. Would it be possible to provide a link? Nigel On 15/12/2013 23:30, Eric Walker wrote: Hi, I just discovered a free vector graphic illustration program that runs on a Mac and have taken the opportunity to create some illustrations that describe what I think might be happening with LENR: http://rolling-balance.blogspot.com/2013/12/what-i-think-might-be-going-on-in-lenr.html The different threads we've talked about over the last few years are starting to come together in a satisfying way: spark discharges (think DGT), fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers and within lightning discharges, the lack of gamma photon emissions, etc. Eric
RE: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
-Original Message- From: Nigel Dyer I'm intrigued by the 'fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers' comment. I've had a quick scan on your blog, and a search through the vortex-l archive, and a search in the web and cant find anything obvious. Would it be possible to provide a link? Nigel This could be a reference to nuclear transmutation associated with high voltage power lines. Very long and careful study done by Professor Hammack, but I checked the URL just now and the link is dead. He seems to have moved to a new University. Possibly the papers are available on Wayback. Executive summary: lots of nuclear transmutation found under HV power lines. POWER LINE STUDIES I: LABORATORY AND FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS RELATING RADIOACTIVITY AND ALTERNATING ELECTRIC AND/OR MAGNETIC FIELDS http://staff.jccc.net/rhammack/section01.html thru http://staff.jccc.net/rhammack/section04.html
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
After studying the atmosphere for a year or so I am getting this WEIRD feeling that whenever we add energy of any kind to the atmosphere above our heads, which I believe contains a vacuum component, some of it comes back down through us as an increase in entropy(vacuum) flowing to the Earth's core, which results in an increase in weakly ionizing radiation below to the Earth and all biology That is possibly one of the reasons why all developed countries have an increase in the rates of some cancers, autism, algae blooms, etc. I have plotted 2 years of fish kills due to hypoxia/algae blooms in Florida along with 5 years of sinkhole data and they appear to lineup. They also are clustered around the major Doppler towers. http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/12/13/when-2-5-bad/ I predict if you live in those clustered areas you will AGE FASTER due to increased ionization. Just my weird thought for the day. Stewart On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: -Original Message- From: Nigel Dyer I'm intrigued by the 'fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers' comment. I've had a quick scan on your blog, and a search through the vortex-l archive, and a search in the web and cant find anything obvious. Would it be possible to provide a link? Nigel This could be a reference to nuclear transmutation associated with high voltage power lines. Very long and careful study done by Professor Hammack, but I checked the URL just now and the link is dead. He seems to have moved to a new University. Possibly the papers are available on Wayback. Executive summary: lots of nuclear transmutation found under HV power lines. POWER LINE STUDIES I: LABORATORY AND FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND EXPERIMENTS RELATING RADIOACTIVITY AND ALTERNATING ELECTRIC AND/OR MAGNETIC FIELDS http://staff.jccc.net/rhammack/section01.html thru http://staff.jccc.net/rhammack/section04.html
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:28 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: After studying the atmosphere for a year or so I am getting this WEIRD feeling that whenever we add energy of any kind to the atmosphere above our heads, which I believe contains a vacuum component, some of it comes back down through us as an increase in entropy(vacuum) flowing to the Earth's core, which results in an increase in weakly ionizing radiation below to the Earth and all biology Ah, hah! You have discovered Tesla's theory of global resonance! He believed that he could establish a resonating field much as you have described and tap a source of energy yet to be discovered (except by NT himself).
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
Terry, Yes. The global resonance is created by decaying strings of quantum dark/vacuum energy decaying in our jet streams and into the Earth. They decay thru quantum decoherence within the Earth and atmosphere. They are a result of our quantum gravity field with the Sun and INFLATION. While these Cosmic Strings oscillate and decay, they gradually ionize and condense space in their surroundings (including you and I). IT PROVES M THEORY, IT IS QUINTESSENCE, IT IS AN UNLIMTED SOURCE OF ENERGY. Take away the clouds, and hurricanes are oscillating, entangled cosmic strings of vacuum. They create microseisms/earthquakes along their path as well as sinkholes in the Earth. WE ARE LIVING ON A 6-D TORROIDAL BRANE OF VACUUM ENERY. Humans are just the pretty baryonic decay window dressing. My research is just an extension to prove M Theory and develop a theory of quantum gravity. I have identified lots of strings in our atmosphere. http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/04/15/is-it-our-brane-thats-still-foggy-or-is-it-just-string-theory-for-dummies-me/ All of us humans are caught within the collapsing wavefunctions of dark/vacuum energy from the Sun and we experience it as storms, our own decay and seismic activity. PRETTY WEIRD Stewart On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:28 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: After studying the atmosphere for a year or so I am getting this WEIRD feeling that whenever we add energy of any kind to the atmosphere above our heads, which I believe contains a vacuum component, some of it comes back down through us as an increase in entropy(vacuum) flowing to the Earth's core, which results in an increase in weakly ionizing radiation below to the Earth and all biology Ah, hah! You have discovered Tesla's theory of global resonance! He believed that he could establish a resonating field much as you have described and tap a source of energy yet to be discovered (except by NT himself).
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: -Original Message- From: Nigel Dyer I'm intrigued by the 'fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers' comment. ... Nigel This could be a reference to nuclear transmutation associated with high voltage power lines. ... Yes, that sounds right -- thanks Jones. I didn't remember that detail very accurately. In my head the concepts high voltage power line and transmutation became transformer and fusion. I would not have made a very good journalist. Eric
[Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
Hi, I just discovered a free vector graphic illustration program that runs on a Mac and have taken the opportunity to create some illustrations that describe what I think might be happening with LENR: http://rolling-balance.blogspot.com/2013/12/what-i-think-might-be-going-on-in-lenr.html The different threads we've talked about over the last few years are starting to come together in a satisfying way: spark discharges (think DGT), fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers and within lightning discharges, the lack of gamma photon emissions, etc. Eric
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
How do you explain the Rossi reaction where only a heat spike is used to initiate the reaction? On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I just discovered a free vector graphic illustration program that runs on a Mac and have taken the opportunity to create some illustrations that describe what I think might be happening with LENR: http://rolling-balance.blogspot.com/2013/12/what-i-think-might-be-going-on-in-lenr.html The different threads we've talked about over the last few years are starting to come together in a satisfying way: spark discharges (think DGT), fusion observed in the vicinity of transformers and within lightning discharges, the lack of gamma photon emissions, etc. Eric
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: How do you explain the Rossi reaction where only a heat spike is used to initiate the reaction? My best guess at this point: he's using a thermionic emitter such as lanthanum hexaboride, which will emit sparks at higher temperatures (this idea was inspired by something you said a few months ago). Eric
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanthanum_hexaboride The principal use of lanthanum hexaboride is in hot cathodeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_cathode, either as a single crystal or as a coating deposited by physical vapor deposition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_vapor_deposition. Hexaborides, such as lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6) and cerium hexaboridehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerium_hexaboride(CeB 6), have low work functions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function, around 2.5 eV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt. The voltage produce by heat only is low. Is that true? On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: How do you explain the Rossi reaction where only a heat spike is used to initiate the reaction? My best guess at this point: he's using a thermionic emitter such as lanthanum hexaboride, which will emit sparks at higher temperatures (this idea was inspired by something you said a few months ago). Eric
Re: [Vo]:possible explanation with illustrations
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: The principal use of lanthanum hexaboride is in hot cathodeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_cathode, either as a single crystal or as a coating deposited by physical vapor deposition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_vapor_deposition. Hexaborides, such as lanthanum hexaboride (LaB6) and cerium hexaboridehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerium_hexaboride(CeB 6), have low work functions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function, around 2.5 eV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt. The voltage produce by heat only is low. Is that true? I'm not sure. I'm guessing that for an individual ejection of an electron, the energy is low, since thermionic emission is a chemical process. But if a significant current can be set up by a large number of simultaneous events, then I suppose the low amount of energy in an individual event will not be a show-stopper. Keep in mind that if in a hypothetical scenario you could interpose a single electron between two fusion precursors, I understand the tunneling probability changes significantly. Here we're talking about transients possibly with a large number of electrons that could have a stronger effective charge per unit length than a single electron magically held between two nuclei. I believe the principle behind the Polwell is the virtual cathode formed by electrons at the center of the device attract positively charged ions to them and to one another, increasing the tunneling probability. This is a similar idea, but on miniature scale and hopefully with higher charge density. In this case I doubt that the fusion would result from the ions being accelerated towards one another; instead, I assume it would occur because they are slowly drawn nearby one another and linger around. Eric
