Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 5:48 PM 12/10/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Thank you for responding to my revised post.
Synchronisation is done beforehand.
e.g. Synchronise two clocks at the sender's location.
Then move one of the clocks to the receiver's location.
Atomic
On Friday 10 December 2004 19:03, Horace Heffner wrote:
At 5:48 PM 12/10/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Thank you for responding to my revised post.
Synchronisation is done beforehand.
e.g. Synchronise two clocks at the sender's location.
Then move one of the clocks to the receiver's location.
Harry Veeder wrote:
Synchronisation is done beforehand.
e.g. Synchronise two clocks at the sender's
location.
Then move one of the clocks to the receiver's
location.
Problems arise here, due to relativistic effects. If
you move one of the clocks, its time will be different
than that of the
--- Standing Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Listers
I would like to say that IMHO any photons
actually measured at greater
that 'c' would be enough to shake the foundations of
the Einstein religion
to its very foundations. And I do mean .ANY
photons!
My thoughts on this
At 4:02 PM 12/10/4, Harry Veeder wrote:
Sorry I made a few typos and misused some terms.
Harry
Here is a proposal for a natural measure of FTL messaging.
I say it is natural because it does not require a response message.
The relevant variables are:
1) T - communication time. The time it
Sorry I made a few typos and misused some terms.
Harry
Here is a proposal for a natural measure of FTL messaging.
I say it is natural because it does not require a response message.
The relevant variables are:
1) T - communication time. The time it takes to send and receive a message.
6 matches
Mail list logo
