-----Original Message-----
From: fznidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 1:00 pm
Subject: Fwd: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Nuclear physicists limit themselves to two bodied problems and don't seem to
understand collective motions.
Electrical engineers work with collective motions all of the time. That's why
it takes and Electrical Engineer, like me,
to explain things to them.
Take an isolated electron. A magnetic field follows its motion. Take two
moving together. Yes there are two magnetic fields following the motion but
there will be another mutually induced field also following the motion.
The induced component becomes signification when designing air core RF
transformations.
Take an isolated nucleon. A magnetic SPIN ORBIT force follows its motion.
Take a gadzillon nucleons moving together in a proton conductor. The long
range strong magnetic component of the nuclear force becomes dominant.
Get the movement going at 1 million meters per second and the arguments also
provide a classical solution for the quantum condition.
Simple logic.
Frank Z
-----Original Message-----
From: fznidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 12:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Thats a common mistake. We cannot reduce the Coulomb barrier. The static
force fields are conserved and cannot be reduced in a two body problem. The
static force field can, however, be bypassed by a force with longer range.
The magnetic component of the strong nuclear force is called the spin orbit
force. It is never considered by the hot fusion people. In the solid cold
fusion environment the magnetic component can be increased by a factor to 10 to
the 39 power. Again I am not speaking of the electromagnetic field, I am
speaking of the magnetic component of the strong nuclear force. In short "The
constants of the motion tend toward the electromagnetic in a Bose condensate
that is vibrated at a dimensional frequency of 1.094 megahertz-meters."
Frank Z
The Coulomb repulsion can be reduced by magnetic attraction according to my
thoughts and that would also explain magnetic interactions and low temperature
operation of LENR devices. Should we drop the reference to Coulomb barrier and
replace it with reference to an Electromagnetic Barrier?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 11:39 am
Subject: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it is to
overcome for fusion events to occur. Perhaps we should consider it as an
electromagnetic barrier instead. There is plenty of reason to suspect that a
magnetic component of force is active along with the electric component.
Some in this list believe that spin coupling has a large impact upon the rate
of LENR activity and there may well be other magnetic interactions associated
with nano particles and their large local magnetic fields. I tend to think
that these couplings are a key concept that needs to be understood in detail if
an ultimate theory is to be developed.
The Coulomb repulsion can be reduced by magnetic attraction according to my
thoughts and that would also explain magnetic interactions and low temperature
operation of LENR devices. Should we drop the reference to Coulomb barrier and
replace it with reference to an Electromagnetic Barrier?
Dave
