Subject: Your article on cold fusion has a strong POV, for
obvious reasons
Dear Mr. Wales,
Greetings.
I work as an editor and translator for a group of roughly 200 retired
scientists and university professors who are working on cold fusion
energy. I maintain a web page on the subject:
By the way, I see no point to creating a second article
under the title of LENR, because as I understand it the
skeptics will be free to trash that article too. I am not going to work
on this project for a week only to have some idiot trash it.
- Jed
Why not simply make a short statement that is not arguable. Something
like: A differing minority view is held by over 200 retired scientists and
university professors who are working on cold fusion energy. For related
publications see: http://lenr-canr.org/.
If such a clearly true statement is
At 03:31 PM 3/3/2005 -0900, you wrote:
Why not simply make a short statement that is not arguable. Something
like: A differing minority view is held by over 200 retired scientists and
university professors who are working on cold fusion energy. For related
publications see:
4 matches
Mail list logo
