On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
It is somewhat frustrating to me that no one seems to have ever
read, or
if so, understood what I have written...
It requires time for us mere mortals - a considerable time of study
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:21:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
How Does Hagelstein Explain
Energetic Alphas?
Theoretical Speculations on Upper Limits:
The alpha particle must be born with an
energy less than 20.3 KeV.
(Pay no attention to Lipson et al. 2002 11-16
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
BTW I find the whole idea of using the volume of the cathode to compare energy
densities proving some form of fusion to be silly. Clearly the volume of
electrolyte is of far more consequence, given that it is this which
contains the
putative fuel anyway.
I
On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:42 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Wed, 24 Mar 2010
13:21:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
How Does Hagelstein Explain
Energetic Alphas?
Theoretical Speculations on “Upper Limits”:
“The alpha particle must be born with an
energy less
I just wrote: I think this is a misunderstanding of what the 20.3
keV represents. It does not represent the Q of the reaction. It
represents an (experimental) upper limit on the kinetic energy the
4He obtains from the reaction. This is not at all a surprising
result if, as I and various
At 05:42 PM 3/24/2010, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I haven't read Hagelstein's paper, but it seems to me that one must base any
such analysis on individual experiments where both He and heat are measured
concurrently and as precisely as possible.
Read the paper. It's not about what you think
At 06:37 PM 3/24/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:42 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Wed, 24 Mar 2010
13:21:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
How Does Hagelstein Explain
Energetic Alphas?
Theoretical Speculations on Upper Limits:
The
At 07:21 PM 3/24/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
This was a wandering mind tying. 8^) It should say: I think this
is a misunderstanding of what the 20.3 keV represents. It does not
represent the Q of the reaction. It represents an (experimental)
upper limit on the kinetic energy the 4He obtains
On Mar 24, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 07:21 PM 3/24/2010, Horace Heffner wrote:
This was a wandering mind tying. 8^) It should say: I think this
is a misunderstanding of what the 20.3 keV represents. It does not
represent the Q of the reaction. It represents an
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
It is somewhat frustrating to me that no one seems to have ever read, or
if so, understood what I have written...
It requires time for us mere mortals - a considerable time of study
contemplation (not to mention procrastination) before the
At 06:11 PM 3/24/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
BTW I find the whole idea of using the volume of the cathode to
compare energy
densities proving some form of fusion to be silly. Clearly the volume of
electrolyte is of far more consequence, given that it is this which
11 matches
Mail list logo
