Just exploring? Would you like more of these sort of comments from Hansen,
perhaps?
Or maybe people with some authority trying to compare climate deniers to
pedophiles, as recently reported on Drudge?
This is something hard to accept for convinced people, but it is a great
principle.
The free speech constitutional principle seems very important...
LENR seems victim of an indirect restriction of free speech in science,
where inconvenient position lead to lost of funding, and blacklisting...
The guy obviously has a major problem to think this way. I wonder if he will
be willing to accept that penalty should it be shown that global warming is
natural and can be mitigated in the future by relatively simple means?
Speaking of settled science
Dave
-Original Message-
At 10:18 AM 12/31/2012, Zell, Chris wrote:
http://joannenova.com.au/2012/12/death-threats-anyone-austrian-prof-global-warming-deniers-should-be-sentenced-to-death/
This ugly spirit is ruining free inquiry and science in
general. Fortunately, he lacks credibility on the subject.
Before
4 matches
Mail list logo
