--- On Tue, 2/8/11, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Jones Beene
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The New Thorium Cycle ?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 9:52 PM
Thanks for the information George.
As you know, there is little way to avoid "further speculation" in this group,
Hello Jones,
I'm glad to see the possibilities of cold thorium fission being explored.
As an technically unqualified scientific layman, I was one of the
skeptics in months of debate on V-L in 1997 re the transmutation
claims by the Cincinnati group -- you may not be surprised that the
skeptics ag
Thanks for the information George.
As you know, there is little way to avoid "further speculation" in this
group, but I am going to try to abstain, as it is probably counterproductive
at this stage.
Jones
-Original Message-
From: George Holz
Jones Beene wrote:
[JB] There are some he
Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] wrote:
[JB] There are some heavy hitters in DoE and the major Universities
behind thorium as a replacement for uranium. But that is for use
in an expensive breeding cycle which has most of the negatives
of any fission scheme.
[GH] The company behind the
4 matches
Mail list logo
