Hi Jones,
Here's some fresh links for ya.
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2005/split/729-1.html
http://technocrat.net/article.pl?sid=05/04/27/2025254mode=thread
And your link,
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/28/science/28fusion.html?
The voltages quoted seem lower than what we
were looking at yesterday,
: Thursday, April 28, 2005 3:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Times: Tabletop Fusion
Am I missing something? What is the advantage of
using the pyroelectric crystal as a high voltage
source over some other more conventional power
supply?
M
are
not missing anything.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 3:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Times: Tabletop Fusion
Am I missing something? What is the advantage of
using the pyroelectric crystal as a high
Could this similarity to sonofusion be part of
Putterman's nefarious agenda... you remember, in his
recent downplaying of normal sonofusion. This guy
could end up being a bad actor in terms of
intellectual-greed, so to speak... but thanks to the
internet his past deeds will likely catch up with
4 matches
Mail list logo
