On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Thank you for not adding "all the livelong day"
I prefer "See the little pufferbellies all in a row."
>
> Seriously ... Check out ORC
>
> http://www.infinityturbine.com/ORC/ORC_Waste_Heat_Turbine.html
>
> This looks interesting for conversion
So, Rich,
Your original post also copies Scott, his daughter and Uncle Hal. Any
reason you're not "makin' it right" with them?
T
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> My guess is there is a need to
> maintain a gradient in order to start the reactor and that is the work
> of the PLCs.
BTW, the gradient is pure speculation on my part. I just know that
when you exit infinite improbability space abruptly, yo
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Jed, it's a container, with all the walls at several hundred degrees C or
> higher; the bottom's in contact with the burner and is probably at about
> 1000 C.
>
> There is nothing inside the container except gas: Gaseous water.
>
> Yet you are claiming the gas insid
Terry Blanton wrote:
> Oh, I seem to remember that self - sustain meant working at only 100 W
> electrical input.
>
Celani said that on Monday. That was his somewhat arbitrary definition of
self-sustaining, during his talk. However, Levi et al. mentioned that the
machine self-sustained complete
Hi Jed,
What you wrote is true when there is liquid water and steam together in
a container - the combination cannot be heated to a temperature higher
than 100 deg C without raising the pressure. However once all the
liquid has turned to gas there is no longer any limit to what
temperature i
wrote:
> What you wrote is true when there is liquid water and steam together in a
> container - the combination cannot be heated to a temperature higher than
> 100 deg C without raising the pressure. However once all the liquid has
> turned to gas there is no longer any limit to what temperatu
Hi Peter
> At least and eventually the community at Chennai tries to determine
> what the PROBLEM with field, see please Krivit's blog - and if you
> will be so kind, my comment to it.
If you would be so kind as to point me to the specific reference. It isn't
obvious to me what reference you are
>From Peter:
...
> The essence is that Cold Fusion is unfortunately in a
> deep, diversified, damned trouble
See my original post.
I rest my case.
> ... but perhaps there is a way out.
Yes, perhaps there is.
The evolution of science is a patient but impartial mistress.
Regards,
Steven Vinc
Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a reservoir holding a
substance with high specific heat and high melting point. Into the
reservoir, and through a tube into the box, may flow water, and steam
may escape. Internal controls may regulate flow. Hot air may be used
to initially heat the su
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
> Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a reservoir holding a substance
> with high specific heat and high melting point. Into the reservoir, and
> through a tube into the box, may flow water, and steam may escape. Internal
> control
I am a chemist (chemical engineer, actually) Can you give some
practical examples and heat balances for them?
Thanks!
Peter
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
> wrote:
> > Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a rese
On 02/10/2011 08:28 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> mailto:jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au>> wrote:
>
>
> What you wrote is true when there is liquid water and steam
> together in a container - the combination cannot be heated to a
> temperature higher than 100 deg C without raising the pressu
On 2/10/2011 9:28 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
mailto:jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au>> wrote:
What you wrote is true when there is liquid water and steam
together in a container - the combination cannot be heated to a
temperature higher than 100 deg C without raising the pressure.
Howeve
--- On Tue, 2/8/11, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Jones Beene
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The New Thorium Cycle ?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 9:52 PM
Thanks for the information George.
As you know, there is little way to avoid "further speculation" in this group,
but I am goi
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/09/us-science-cern-idUSTRE7185AQ20110209
(Reuters) - Scientists at the CERN research center seeking answers to
key mysteries of the cosmos said on Wednesday they would be moving
ahead cautiously this year to avoid any possible breakdown in their
giant LHC mac
On 02/10/2011 11:19 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/09/us-science-cern-idUSTRE7185AQ20110209
>
> (Reuters) - Scientists at the CERN research center seeking answers to
> key mysteries of the cosmos said on Wednesday they would be moving
> ahead cautiously this yea
Several Distinguished Scientists have informed me that I am wrong, and that
gas will not expand indefinitely, but that it will rise in temperature even
when it is unconfined. There is a limit to how much it can expand.
Compression heats it and decompression cools it, but only up to a limit. You
can
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Oh? Will that be the year the Tibetan monks finally inscribe name
> number 9,000,000,000 in the book?
I thought they had a computer working on that. :-)
T
". . . overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647
Robots to get their own internet
By Mark Ward
Technology correspondent, BBC News
European scientists have embarked on a project to let robots share and
store what they discover about the world.
Called RoboEarth it will be a place that robots can uplo
This is exceptionally weird, even for Steve Krivit:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/02/07/missing-cold-fusion-from-new-energy-times/
I posted a note here mentioning that the best evidence for helium is the
work of Melvin Miles. Krivit said that "New Energy Times has found Melvin
Miles’ report
Terry sez:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647
>
> Robots to get their own internet
> By Mark Ward
> Technology correspondent, BBC News
>
> European scientists have embarked on a project to let robots share and
> store what they discover about the world.
>
> Called RoboEarth it will be
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a reservoir holding a substance
> with high specific heat and high melting point. Into the reservoir, and
> through a tube into the box, may flow water, and steam may escape. Internal
> controls may regulate flow. Hot air may b
Jed,
You are overlooking helium as being supplied by alpha emission from Pd,
instead of from fusion.
This has been the W&L stance - yes, there is helium but it comes from alpha
emission following a beta decay of other weak force interaction.
That was my reason for re-presenting the For
Rich Murray wrote:
"probably, the Rossi demos have a complex control box with thermal controls
that lower the electric input heater power when the reactor gets too hot"
You concede to easily.
I don't believe there is any feedback in that system because the wires are
all heavy power cables,
Or beware of VIKI from I ROBOT.
harry
- Original Message
> From: Terry Blanton
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 12:09:38 PM
> Subject: [Vo]:Here Comes Skynet
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647
>
> Robots to get their own internet
> By Mark Ward
>From Jones
...
> This field cannot be simplified into an either/or situation.
>
> Ockham has no place in this field – LENR it is inherently
> complex.
>
> Krivit and his sponsors are half-right (but half-wrong),
> as is anyone who says that LENR is pure fusion and nothing
> else.
>
> There are c
The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions initiated
by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons.
harry
>
>From: Jed Rothwell
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 12:15:12 PM
>Subject: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results
>
>This is exceptional
Dear Joshua,
a) Have you calculated HOW wet must be the steam in order to invalidate
the experiment i.e. to make it underunity beyond any doubt?
b) Let's take the good part of it, as engineers how has to be built such a
generator for VERY WET steam? It can have some uses e.g in the textile
indus
Jed Rothwell wrote:
"Celani said that on Monday. That was his somewhat arbitrary definition of
self-sustaining, during his talk. However, Levi et al. mentioned that the
machine self-sustained completely, with no power, for about 15 minutes. No
power and no way to turn it off. They exhausted the
On 02/10/2011 02:23 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:
> Dear Joshua,
>
> a) Have you calculated HOW wet must be the steam in order to invalidate
> the experiment i.e. to make it underunity beyond any doubt?
>
> b) Let's take the good part of it, as engineers how has to be built such a
> generator for VERY
a) It would appear that if the water is just boiling (the expelled fluid is
<1% steam), it is already slightly over unity, assuming we can trust the
flow rates, and I have some doubts. But slightly over unity would not be
difficult to achieve chemically, especially with a 14 kg bottle of hydrogen
c
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Addressing just point (3), please leave out the term "dare" here. There's
> no need to escalate this to the realm of an ad hominem.
Peter is Romanian and I am sure he does not intend the term to be ad
hominem. Idioms can make idiots
Good point...
On 02/10/2011 03:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
>> Addressing just point (3), please leave out the term "dare" here. There's
>> no need to escalate this to the realm of an ad hominem.
>>
> Peter is Romanian and
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:59:12 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>My impression is that it was somewhat out of control. I would not want to
>try to scale a machine that does that to 1 MW in the near future.
[snip]
That's the way all fission reactors operate. Borderline nuclear exp
I intended to tell that I think he was convinced that the steam was dry. I
have met Focardi several times and he seems a very nice gentleman. His
association with Rossi is a very complicated problem (I tell this as a
friend of Piantelli, Focardi has worked many years with him.)
As regarding logic
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:59:24 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Consider a well-insulated box. It contains a reservoir holding a
>substance with high specific heat and high melting point. Into the
>reservoir, and through a tube into the box, may flow water, and steam
>
http://www.blacklightpower.com/new.shtml
Dr. Mills will present “Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New
Power Source” at the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Conference on February 14,
2011, at 4:10 PM at the Gaylord National Hotel & Conference Center, 201
Waterfront Street, Nation
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> http://www.blacklightpower.com/new.shtml
>
> Dr. Mills will present “Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New
> Power Source” at the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Conference on February 14,
> 2011, at 4:10 PM at the Gaylord Natio
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
> Has Andrea Rossi become Randell Mills' Steve Jones?
Not sure that is the best analogy, or maybe it is right-on ... but looking
at pages 37-41 look are so close to the way that one can imagine the Rossi
reactor to work (if he had had the funds to d
>From Harry:
> http://www.blacklightpower.com/new.shtml
>
> Dr. Mills will present Thermally Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New
> Power Source at the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Conference on February 14,
> 2011, at 4:10 PM at the Gaylord National Hotel & Conference Center, 201
> Wate
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> ... which is where I think you are going with it, even if it is a slight
> reversal of roles.
Not a Law&Order fan but Belzer does put me in the mind of Mills.
Ya gotta think that Randell has had a baloney sandwich despite his funding.
The C
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> And WTF is going on in Iceland?
Personally, I'm being audited by the IRS. If I can only put them off
for about 20 months, my worries will probably be over.
I'm sure it will get worse.
T
Still got that "reply to" thing, SVJ?
T
-- Forwarded message --
From: Terry Blanton
Date: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Dr. Mills will present “Thermally
Reversible Hydrino Catalyst Systems as a New Power Source”
To: s...@orionworks.com
On Thu, Feb 10
Harry Veeder wrote:
The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions initiated
> by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons.
>
Ah. I see. And I gather it involves lithium as well. Does it consume
deuterium and produce helium at the same rate as DD fusion would? I guess
the lithium deple
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Interesting times..
Pyramids and Big Ben are off my Bucket List.
T
At 12:34 PM 2/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It would be a little tricky to have something like this produce the
output performance of the Rossi device. You would have to have a
secret remote control that vectors most of the cooling water around
the heat source at first, and then gradually sends
Look at www.wikipedia.com for Blacklight Power and then the talk
page -- the only favorable information in two decades is invariably is
put out by BP itself...
Rich Murray
You laugh, but advanced awareness explorers report that all universes
already always all ways remain nonexistent...
within single entire creative fractal hyperinfinity...
The place on which I stand is hole ground.
The birds in the air have their nests in the trees,
The foxes on the earth rest in
Given enough energy fast enough, any gas becomes a black hole, and
then all science reaches the Duh zone...
single source of all that appears objective
of all that feels subjective
within "awareness"
already remains beyond our time and space
beyond the Duh zone...
single entire creative fractal hy
50 matches
Mail list logo
