No. did you read the study or just watch the video?
Laser light, which is thousands of times weaker per photon than gamma
radiation, was stored not blocked - for a fraction of a second, and comes
out at the same frequency it went in.
The light was not attenuated or captured ! Plus the
Dave--
I suspect that most of the theory is Yeong Kim's and the experimental
description is from John Hadjichristos of DGT.
Kim had proposed the BEC idea some time ago.
I find Kim's theory quite reasonable. The ability to predict the rate of
reactions is significant and the importance
Dave--
One other idea is that the early failure of many of the P-F effect experiments
did not pay attention to the magnetic field present in P-F's original
experiment. Hagelstein's current lectures at MIT point this out indirectly by
displaying the arrangement of the electrodes in the
See:
http://pesn.com/2014/02/05/9602432_LENR-to-Market_Digest_February5/
Bob,
This information that you share may be a clue to follow up on. Exactly how the
field interacts might to be important. Thanks.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 5, 2014 2:40 pm
Subject: Re:
Of interest - in this regard is that the magnetic field used in the
Letts/Cravens effect is fairly weak. Did not Dennis mention to vortex that it
needs to be weak and the effect goes away if it is too strong?
Here is a paper mentioning 700 Gauss – across the cathode face, from a
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:39:45 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Why is the voltage impactful: High volts produce LENR and high amps produce
hydrinos?
How does this distinction fit into Mills theory?
To start with, 600 keV electrons will produce lots of X-rays. They could also
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:26 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, got it.
Well according to SR all motion or stillness is an illusion.
But I think a better analogy would be calling someone by a different name
because when they are moving their face looks motion blurred.
One
real is ultimately defined in terms of parsimony aka Ockham's Razor.
While it is true that if one's concerns are sufficiently limited, Ockham's
Razor cuts differently, it is also true that one frequently misses
opportunity by donning such blinders.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:40 PM, H Veeder
Scientific American recently published an article called The Case against
Copernicus.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-case-against-copernicus/
Copernicus famously said that Earth revolves around the sun. But
opposition to this revolutionary idea didn't come just from the religious
Wait until everyone realizes the Earth is not round...:)
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Scientific American recently published an article called The Case against
Copernicus.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-case-against-copernicus/
It is interesting that the magnets are shown in that application.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 5, 2014 3:28 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:a note from Dr. Stoyan Sargoytchev
Of interest - in this
I read it at a news stand (cheapskate that I am).
Some of the key issues I recalled and looked up :
Copernicus (1543) : Not actually improved until Newton's theory of gravity
(1687) explained how the earth could be moved in its orbit, Bessel's parallax
(1838) observation got the distance to
All of Ruby Carat's/Jeremy Ry's videos are now up
http://coldfusionnow.org/2014-cold-fusion-101-video-lectures/
Particularly day 5 Hagelstein
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=Al7NMQLvATo
From my cryptic notes (H:M) :
1:25 : he disagrees with Ed Storms, because you need
1:50+- Phonon/Accoustic coupling should be about 8Thz -- compare with the
recent
discussion about Bushnell's 5-30Thz stimulation
(Actually I couldn't see Bushnell saying that)
I viewed it again, and couldn't hear a specific frequency mentioned.
Thanks for posting this, Jones. It reminds me of an earlier post on Vortex
that was a compilation of LENR theories but I cannot find it with the
search engine nor even with google. So I'll need to circle back on this
item to comment on it because I intended to contrast your post to the
earlier
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Particularly day 5 Hagelstein
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=Al7NMQLvATo
Interesting video. I have always been a little mystified by Peter
Hagelstein's theory. My understanding is that in its current
17 matches
Mail list logo
