You can access them by going here:
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
And then searching on the dependent patents in turn:
61818553
61819058
61821914
CLick on the image file wrapper and the filling of interest.
Looks there's some things to look at there. If anyone can posts direct
l
Looks like 61819058 is the arxiv report.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
wrote:
> You can access them by going here:
>
> http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
>
> And then searching on the dependent patents in turn:
>
> 61818553
> 61819058
> 61821914
>
> CLick on the image
61821914 looks like subset of the published patent app.
So, I don't see anything signficantly new here, but there might be some
details lurking in the deltas between this and other documents currently
published.
What's interesting to me is how much these "third party independent"
reports are bein
61818553 looks like the december report (2012?)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
wrote:
> 61821914 looks like subset of the published patent app.
>
> So, I don't see anything signficantly new here, but there might be some
> details lurking in the deltas between this and other docu
Jones, John,
John [snip] Heat is a chaotic form of random microscopic changes
in kinetic energy, if so there should be windows where there is no change in
momentum which could be argued to be as localized moments of zero heat?[/snip]
Jones [snip] This possibility would also sugges
For some time, LENR theorists and perceptive observers have noted the
cross-connections between thermal gain in metal hydrides and some form of
HTSC, be it local or transitory.
HTSC= High Temperature Superconductivity.
SPP= Surface Plasmon Polariton
Perovskite structure is one cross-connection
A few things I'm not clear about in the 1MW "reactor 600"
Fig 17 :
http://pdfaiw.uspto.gov/.aiw?docid=20140326711&PageNum=14&IDKey=72E161583AAE&HomeUrl=http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-adv.html%2526r=1%2526p=1%2526
The patent is invalid. The catalyst has to be specified in at least a
preferred embodiment.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> The USPTO has an 18 month embargo on publication, which is* optional* and
> not required - and they chose not to avail themselves of the delayed
> p
> The total output is 1.440113 MW --- so "reactor 600" is most likely the
> initial on-site customer acceptance test for the new 1MW system
Correction -- the total excess output was 1.44 MWh ... but the duration isn't
described, so the power can't be calculated.
Greetings Vortex-l
Googling: Vincent Clark and electroceuticals is better:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/home-brain-stimulation-gaining-followers
Ad Astra,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Doylestown PA
10 matches
Mail list logo
