[Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times News Headlines

LENR reporting has had similar features. Reporting excess power in watts/cm3 disguised the fact that very small volumes were reported so the real excess power almost never exceeded a watt! After thirty years no repeatable and verifiable power output has exceeded one watt. This may surprise

Re: [Vo]:Fw: New Energy Times News Headlines

Brian Ahern wrote: > LENR reporting has had similar features. Reporting excess power in > watts/cm3 disguised the fact that very small volumes were reported so the > real excess power almost never exceeded a watt! > 1. They are not "disguised." Most papers report absolute

[Vo]:No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work

“No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work As An Energy Source” This is from Forbes – not Fusion Technology, but it is hard to argue with it. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/11/08/no-melting-quarks-will-never-work-as-an-energy-source/#f23d01922327 However, there are other similar

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Article: This Overlooked Theory Could Be The Missing Piece That Explains How The EM Drive Works

Bob, I realize I am way out of the box here and perhaps my syntax is lacking but the point I was trying to make is that the new physics behind the EM drive and anomalous heat may simply be a new form of our old friend SR.. we can't talk over unity wrt normal SR since it takes so much energy to

RE: [Vo]:No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work

Jones— And lets not forget Philippe Hatt’s model of the makeup of the proton, neutron and muons (consistent with Stubb’s data and theory.) About Hatt reported the following: “I was recently in Sochi ,Russia to present my views to colleagues and was asked to write articles to be published on

Re: [Vo]:No, Melting Quarks Will Never Work

I thought that mass was a state change reaction involving the Higgs field??? On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:23 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Jones— > > > > And lets not forget Philippe Hatt’s model of the makeup of the proton, > neutron and muons (consistent with

[Vo]:Self-driving shuttle crashes in Las Vegas hours after launch

https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/8/16626224/las-vegas-self-driving-shuttle-crash-accident-first-day While it was technically the fault of the truck driver and not the fault of the self-driving shuttle, if the self driving shuttle had been programmed to allow it to back up the collision could

Re: [Vo]:Self-driving shuttle crashes in Las Vegas hours after launch

Assuming there wasn't a baby carriage behind the shuttle! On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:20 PM, H LV wrote: > https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/8/16626224/las-vegas-self- > driving-shuttle-crash-accident-first-day > > > While it was technically the fault of the truck driver and