RE: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Jones Beene
From: Jed Rothwell I do not think there is any evidence for muons in cold fusion. JB: There is actually plenty of evidence along with plenty of data some of which was presented. You may not think the evidence is credible, but you are not a nuclear engineer ➢ People who are nuclear engineers

Re: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Axil Axil
An experiment similar to Letts-Cravens. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-4484/26/23/234002 Experimental observation of anomalous thermal radiation from a three-dimensional metallic photonic crystal Abstract We report some striking results on thermal radiation properties of a

Re: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: > >- I do not think there is any evidence for muons in cold fusion. > > > > > > > > There is actually plenty of evidence along with plenty of data some of > which was presented. > > > > You may not think the evidence is credible, but you are not a nuclear > engineer >

Re: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Bob Higgins
Jones, I don't think the Letts-Cravens experiment is similar to Holmlid at all. They used two calibrated wavelength lasers superimposed on the cathode. They found that when the lasers were separated by a specific frequency difference in the 10-20 THz range, there was a peaking in the XP. For

RE: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Jones Beene
Bob, One interpretation of the input parameters and the use of very weak lasers by L/C (comparatively) is that for them to see any anomalous thermal effect, they had to hit a special resonance frequency in order to get results. OTOH if a far more powerful laser is available and is employed –

RE: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Jones Beene
Here is an opinion which almost no one who is not Swedish shares, as of now. The opinion is that the bottom line for LENR (being relevant for the future) and for this being the “best” conference in a while, really boils down to one detail: muons. Nothing else which has happened in almost 30

RE: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Jones Beene
From: Jed Rothwell ➢ I do not think there is any evidence for muons in cold fusion. There is actually plenty of evidence along with plenty of data some of which was presented. You may not think the evidence is credible, but you are not a nuclear engineer -- and senior nuclear engineers

[Vo]:Uploaded Mizuno's ICCF-21 PowerPoint slides

2018-06-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
I uploaded Mizuno's PowerPoint slides that I presented at ICCF-21. These include my notes that I read during the presentation. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTexcessheat.pdf If other people have ICCF-21 slides, posters or papers they would like me to upload, please sent them to me. The

Re: [Vo]:Uploaded Mizuno's ICCF-21 PowerPoint slides

2018-06-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
I just now added the poster with the two data tables.

Re: [Vo]:I think this was the best ICCF conference in a while

2018-06-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: > Most LENR proponents do not want to talk about fission. Actually they see > it as a deal-killer, so to speak instead of a killer-app … > I have never heard they don't want to talk about this. There were two papers about it at ICCF-21: Hybrid Fusion-Fission Reactor Using