In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:52:36 -0500:
Hi Jed,
Can't you ask the author for a photo copy of the original document?
[snip]
>I recently purchased a new copy of Adobe Acrobat. It does a better job
>converting old documents. They look better and the underlying text
Ah, ha. I may have found her e-mail address. Ain't the internet wonderful?
- Jed
wrote:
> Can't you ask the author for a photo copy of the original document?
>
I can't find her e-mail address. I haven't heard from her in a long time.
She might not have a copy. However, someone pointed out to me that some of
the data is repeated in these two papers:
I recently purchased a new copy of Adobe Acrobat. It does a better job
converting old documents. They look better and the underlying text has
fewer OCR errors.
I decided to rescan some of the large books. I am working on ICCF-5. When I
prepared this book I retyped several papers from scratch and
I reported a similar runaway with Nano nickel powder at 10nm in my 2012 EPRI
report.
From: Arnaud Kodeck
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 12:52 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Yokose et al. report 3 kW peak power from Cu-Ni-Zn composite
At ICCF21,
Nigel and Robin—
How does Jowsey handle electric charge?
And how is icharge associated with mass?
Is there a relation between gravity and the electric/magnetic field that fills
the vacuum?
I like Jessup’s explanations .
Bob
From: mix...@bigpond.com
unified field theory first published 1758 by Boscovich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIUqdAYL_yk
On Wednesday, 21 November 2018, 16:14:23 GMT, Nigel Dyer
wrote:
Bob
I think that the thing to bear in mind is that Richard has started with
relativity, and appears to be heading
Bob
I think that the thing to bear in mind is that Richard has started with
relativity, and appears to be heading towards the smaller scale given
that on ResearchGate he says that is current project is a unified field
theory, which is where I think some of these questions might be answered.
I
8 matches
Mail list logo
