On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
What gives the Rossi type reactor its power is the secret sauce and the
Rossi reaction is different from and more powerful than the Brillouin
reaction.
Considering that Rossi hasn't revealed how the E-Cat system works I
Re-read that sentence ... carefully, this time.
[Mark Gibbs]
On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/08/04/the-state-of-the-cold-fusion-market/
Many have argued that the discrediting of Fleischmann and Pons was
driven and used by others
Thanks for the welcome. Comments inline ...
[mg]
On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Eric Walker wrote:
Le Aug 5, 2012 à 12:21 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com javascript:; a
écrit :
Re-read that sentence ... carefully, this time.
[Mark Gibbs]
Hi Mark,
Good to see you on this list. Your
Jed and Craig,
It's interesting that you both want the mainstream media to pay attention
to cold fusion yet you complain when we don't write *exactly* as you think
we should write.
You complain endlessly about sloppy journalism and how the theories of
cold fusion aren't clearly laid out (as you
I rest my case.
[mg]
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
It's interesting that you both want the mainstream media to pay attention
to cold fusion yet you complain when we don't write *exactly* as you think
we should
kilowatts of
excess heat and temperatures of up to 1,200C, the wait will have been
trivial.
If, if, if ...
As my grandmother used to say: If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.
[Mark Gibbs]
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Sterling Allan
sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com wrote:
**
We could
on the topic and with all of
your connections can only, at best, come up with what are ifs and hopes and
theories.
[m]
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Randy wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:
**
Mark Gibbs:
Mark, I agree with you. However, I am not a journalist. As a journalist,
I would
If the Godes/McKubre system has 100% reproducibility why isn't it the
poster child for CF/LENR?! And why hasn't the CF/LENR research community
exhaustively investigated the system and built working models that would
show, irrefutably, that CF/LENR is real? In following this list I've read
about
://newenergytimes.com/ the document isn't dated (in fact the only date
I noticed in it is 1992 embedded in the URL of a citation).
[mg]
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:16 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.netresponded snarkily:
Mark Gibbs asks rather impatiently,
“Can anyone explain why this system isn't
Thanks, Ruby ... Jed just asked the same question I was going to ask ...
[mg]
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
*One possible private donor seeking a technical evaluation was informed
by a **National Science Foundation**
How about keeping the tank on the roof and using a thermosiphon [1] or,
better still, a passive vapor heat pipe [2] to transfer heat to the tank
from a collector below? The height difference between the collector and the
tank would only have to be a foot or two and you'd want the tank on the
roof
Alan,
( He,he,he,he…) ... I see you left out the next sentence ...
Dear Steven N. Karels:
Your question is inspiring: well, I will not go to Pordenone to clean the
tops of the Dolomites with the wax: it is possible that in the Pordenione
convention I will bring the final results regarding the
If you go back and re-read my previous columns on cold fusion you'll see
that my interest has *always* been in useful cold fusion ... The cold
fusion phenomena,
while scientifically intriguing, amounts to to nothing of practical
interest if you can't do something useful with it ... rather like
I don't have the time to review the huge amount of literature you people
have already looked at ... if any of you, Rothwell included, would like to
help build a list of successful experiments I'd be happy to build it into
an article with full attribution to all contributors. I'd like to see a
list
there is no hope to convince people until there is a working prototype
that we can put on the client table, and that clearly work, even roughly.
I could have sworn that was what I've been writing on and off for the last
year or so!
No one but scientists care if CF exists but isn't useful in the
Exactly.
[mg]
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
But no one is sure what how far you can go with rock solid COP of 1.5 ...
in
terms of a commercial item... Essentially that is Gibbs' point, no?
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
the gibbs like it might be wrongly done or use, so just don't do it
You should read what I write more carefully: I didn't say CF/LENR shouldn't
be used but that possible unintended consequences should be considered.
Something I haven't seen any discussion about is the amount of energy
required to load materials with hydrogen to be used in these various
LENR/CF devices. If that energy is taken into account, are the claims of
excess energy from the operation of the devices still valid?
[mg]
And what about in the MFM Project?
[m]
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, McKubre takes the endothermic loading and exothermic off loading
into his calculations in his work at SRI.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote
, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, McKubre takes the endothermic loading and exothermic off loading
into his calculations in his work at SRI.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Something I haven't seen any discussion about is the amount
, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Something I haven't seen any discussion about is the amount of energy
required to load materials with hydrogen to be used in these various
LENR/CF
devices. If that energy is taken into account, are the claims of excess
energy from
Is it worth pointing out that if you all did what Jed does -- filter Jojo
out -- you wouldn't have to be annoyed over what he says. The end result
would have the same result as banning him without the need for appeals to
the list mom to do the dirty work.
[mg]
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:02 PM,
Pig breeding, Birthers, attacks on Islam, attacks on each other ... what is
the matter with you people?
Jojo throws out blatant nonsense that isn't intended to achieve anything
constructive and that only the most generous would treat as reasonable
discussion and everyone rises to the bait. Abd,
29, 2012 2:24 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age
Unfortunately I sense lots of bad mojo behind many of the posts in this
exchange
On Friday, December 28, 2012, Mark Gibbs wrote:
Pig breeding, Birthers, attacks on Islam, attacks on each other ... what
. What's needed is a moderator who can enforce adult, civilized
behavior.
[m]
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Does anyone know how to get William Beaty to manage the conduct on this
list?
He is probably busy
On Friday, December 28, 2012, Peter Gluck wrote:
but it raises the question if/when will enter LENR such lists?
When there is a testable theory or a demonstrably practical device.
So far, LENR is, to be perhaps somewhat poetic, no more than a
willow-the-wisp ...
[mg]
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
FURTHERMORE, the notion that cold fusion results are unconvincing or close
to the noise is also gross ignorance. People who say this know nothing
about experimental significance.
I never said the results were
James,
Which theory is that?
[mg]
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:01 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Sure, there's lots of interesting experiments but is there a testable
theory?
Yes, there is a widely accepted
of this preamble to the DoE panel's
report as an alternative to his resignation from the panel.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
James,
Which theory is that?
[mg]
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:01 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Dec
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
I am sorry to be abrasive, but this is ignorant nonsense.
Alas, you really aren't sorry. That's just a technique to try to avoid
being called out for incivility.
No, it is pro
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
No, it is pro-forma, Japanese style. It is what you say before you are
forced to be uncivil.
One is never forced to be uncivil.
I cannot describe the facts of the matter
in, I'd definitely tell him
or her to talk to Ed Storms.
So, what are you doing about getting funding for you or someone else to
test your theories?
Regards,
Mark.
On Dec 29, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
So, your considered and thoughtful way to address what you see as
someone's misunderstandings and to educate them is to be insulting and to
attack the man while you address
-- Forwarded message --
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Date: Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:(OT) epidemic and endemic
To: Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
On Dec 29, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
Ed,
On Sat
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
From Mark Gibbs
And remember, this whole discussion is Peter's fault ...
Peter's fault? Whatever...
I was joking. Of course it wasn't his fault ... this may not be the place
for levity
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
**
What if the entire corpus of physics is loaded, and Watson concludes that
LENR is the superior energy solution for the future of humanity, far more
so than hot fusion or fission ?
**
What if Watson concludes
not be surprised, so it's kind of boring.
2013/1/17 Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
**
What if the entire corpus of physics is loaded, and Watson concludes
that LENR is the superior energy solution for the future of humanity, far
Does anyone know what the status is of the Nanor device at MIT? Has it been
kept running? Has anyone duplicated the device and successfully run it?
Thanks in advance.
[mg]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Swartz has been very secretive. His web site:
http://world.std.com/~mica/jettech.html
Yep, that's a lot of ... er, stuff.
Probably the
, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
And the video is AWOL. Sigh.
Damn. Well the .pdf is there:
http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/HagelsteinPdemonstra.pdf
here and
there for support, but there is no NANOR video included (I didn't get
through it to the end though!)
From the release on his website, it seems that there may be some video
from the Swartz portion of the course soon.
On 1/31/13 7:28 PM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7
is magnificent, technology works for us.
Peter
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Gibbs
mgi...@gibbs.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mgi...@gibbs.com');
wrote:
I must be behind the curve ... and what might KILOR and MEGAR be?
[m]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Peter Gluck
peter.gl
http://www.polratings.com/predictions
Currently they're all IT predictions but anyone care to predict what will
happen in CF in 2013? If you have an insight, fire away:
http://www.polratings.com/predictions/prediction-submission/
[mg]
How about throwing in some predictions on world resource use, nuclear
power, wind power, robots, the erosion of funding for HF, or the zombie
apocalypse?
[mg]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The IT predictions are interesting!
I have sworn off
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Yes, but more exactly a trial-and-errorist.
Which is hardly god-like ... it seems to me that the Catholic god
(omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent) is what a true god should be ...
the alpha and omega ... all other
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
However, that still allows for a transcendent impersonal God who operates
as a system - and might even answer prayers.
A true god would not answer prayers as he would have created the conditions
that required your
Too late: http://www.indiegogo.com/robotdragonfly/x/1658702 ... basic
version to be priced at $250 without camera and a camera-less silent
version at $280 (perfect for stealth toxic chemical delivery). Surveillance
version with two cameras (one HD) with an on-board computer that may be
powerful
When I recently suggested in response to Peter Gluck's question [1] that a
testable theory was a necessity for LENR to be recognized as a great
invention [2], it sure seemed like you all disagreed.
It sure sounds like you now think a theory is required ...
[m]
[1]
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
It makes no sense to demand a testable theory or a demonstrably practical
device. Science does not work that way. It usually starts with discovery
and then progresses to theory, to practical device. (On rare occasions
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
They did not need to put first-principles theories of flight in their
patent. Gibbs seems to think this has been a requirement all along.
O'Malley is making unfounded assumptions. Gibbs never wrote or implied any
such
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
They did not need to put first-principles theories of flight in their
patent. Gibbs seems to think
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Gibbs didn't say anything about the Wright Brothers ... that was Ed
Storms:
Wrong person! Ed was speaking loosely.
Ah, so if Ed speaks loosely it's OK and forgivable but if I do
A question for Ed:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The definition of success rate in these experiments is fuzzy. Ed stated
with 90 cathodes. He tested them and identified 4 that met all of his
criteria. These 4 worked robustly, and repeatedly. So,
looking for the critical
feature, but I believe they have not yet looked at small enough scale to
see the active sites, which I believe are in the 1-5 nm range.
Ed
On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
A question for Ed:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw
BTW, did everyone see the Gizmag article NASA's basement reactor (
http://m.gizmag.com/article/26309). It's a bit fluffy and hand-waving but I
was intrigued by this section:
According to Zawodny, LENR isn’t what was thought of as cold fusion and it
doesn't involve strong nuclear forces. Instead,
“People have often thought there’s no upper bound for wind power—that it’s
one of the most scalable power sources,” says Harvard University applied
physicist David Keith. After all, gusts and breezes don’t seem likely to
“run out” on a global scale in the way oil wells might run dry.
Yet the
I don't think this link has been posted to this list yet:
http://futureinnovation.larc.nasa.gov/view/articles/futurism/bushnell/low-energy-nuclear-reactions.html
** **
[m]
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2013/02/light-particles-illuminate-vacuum
In an article published in the PNAS scientific journal, researchers from
Aalto University and the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland showed
experimentally that vacuum has properties not previously observed.
According to the
http://www.universetoday.com/100298/is-a-comet-on-a-collision-course-with-mars/
There is an outside chance that a newly discovered comet might be on a
collision course with Mars. Astronomers are still determining the
trajectory of the comet, named C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring), but at the very
least,
(Sing to the tune As Time Goes By)
And so, it's come to this
A miss is just a miss
When a comet's passing by
The fundamental laws apply
Across the sky ...
[mg]
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Jed Rothwell
jedrothw...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jedrothw...@gmail.com');
wrote:
So, a
http://www.rdmag.com/news/2013/03/nanotubes-generate-huge-electric-currents-osmotic-flow
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524911.600-13-things-that-do-not-make-sense.html?full=true
And #13 is ...
[m]
13 Cold fusion
AFTER 16 years, it's back. In fact, cold fusion never really went away.
Over a 10-year period from 1989, US navy labs ran more than 200 experiments
to
Bugger. Missed that. I assumed that they'd link from a current article [1]
to a current article, not to history and now I find that that original
article, which was linked to a current article wasn't any such thing ... it
was also from 2005! I am now very suspicious of New Scientist but welcome
Interesting lack of objectivity:
During the congress I met Andrea Rossi for the first time. In my
estimation he is kind, competent and reputable.
[mg]
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Further to the thread about gammas, here are these money quotes
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Interesting lack of objectivity:
During the congress I met Andrea Rossi for the first time. In my
estimation he is kind, competent and reputable.
Why do you say this reflects
Are the fine details of the Toyota experimental set up known? Has anyone
tried to replicate that configuration?
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Others said that the Toyota research and the NEDO program were stopped
because progress was too slow (I
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.bewrote:
Rossi has recently stated in JONP that local hot spots in its reactor were
the main issue. If a spot come to a certain upper threshold, the reactor
goes out of control.
Does anyone know what happens when Rossi's
So, in run away mode the reactor can do/always does emit radiation (of what
type? X-rays and/or gamma?) is it possible that the casing of the reactor
and the other components would not become radioactive? Is there any
information as to what type of detector Celani used? If the spectators at
the
Consider yourself asked ... oh, and what type of radiation was/would be
involved?
[mg]
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
If you require the theory behind this overview, just ask.
, this is
the Internet ... you can cite a link as Alan Fletcher did so people can get
directly to the original article (which, BTW, has been updated). Copying
the entire piece to hundreds of people just wastes bits.
William, please delete Kevin's post from the archive.
Yours,
Mark Gibbs.
On Tue, May
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
There's another way to perpetrate the output hoax, and that's to secrete
infrared lasers in the ceiling and heat the device up remotely.
Lasers?! Don't you think that seems just a little farfetched? And it
raises, once again, as
reputation.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Kevin,
Publishing a summary or abstract of my piece would have been fine (under
the concept of Fair Use) but posting my article in full to a list (and a
public list at that) is a breach of both my copyright and Forbes
on the hit list.
Wrong. I don't have time to educate you but you are simply wrong.
[mg]
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
I am with Mark. Kevin needs to grow some ethics.
Andrew
- Original Message -
*From:* Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com
We both thank you.
[mg]
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
That's pretty good! Bravo for Mark Giggs . . .
And for Mark Gibbs. Him too.
- Jed
a
different address. Please standby until he has a chance to respond.
This list has benefited you in the past. I suspect your gain exceeds your
loss.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Kevin,
Publishing a summary or abstract of my piece would have been
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Terry,
Thanks. The issue has become a moot point and Bill needn't bother.
I really don't care what you do to the offender; but, injuring this
list is not in your best interest. After all, didn't you get
Does anone have any more in-depth bios of the group that tested the E-Cat.
This is what I have so far:
Giuseppe Levi
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Bologna University
Bologna, Italy
Bio:
Which author is a vet? I didn't find any such thing ...
[mg]
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
Rossi has stated that the testers brought their own cables. A poster here
asserts that they were Rossi's cables. As usual, this issue is not
addressed by the paper.
Sunil,
May I quote you in a Forbes posting? If I may, may I cite your name?
Thanks in advance.
Yours,
Mark Gibbs.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Sunil Shah s.u.n@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
My first post, after a couple of year's hiding in the shadows..
Just want to settle a couple
...@gibbs.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 11:50:29 -0700
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hartman's not a vet...
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sunil,
May I quote you in a Forbes posting? If I may, may I cite your name?
Thanks in advance.
Yours,
Mark Gibbs.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Sunil Shah s.u.n
Mark,
If I get a chance may I quote you?
[mg]
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.netwrote:
There have been more than 60,000 papers published on high-temperature
superconductive material since its discovery in 1986, said Jak Chakhalian,
professor of physics at
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect hand waving began as a derisive reference to occult
activities since these might involve the waving of hands and/or a wand. .
You would be completely wrong. In fact, that is perhaps the most ridiculous
What is a Hydroton? I googled the term and all I could find were references
to a clay-based plant growing medium much prized by marijuana growers ...
[mg]
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.comjavascript:_e({},
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Cude has waved his hands and said there might be a method of deception
that he has not thought of yet. As I have often pointed out, such
assertions cannot be tested or falsified. There might be an error in Ohm's
law we
Daniel,
The link you gave (May 31st, 2013 at 2:53
PMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=806cpage=10#comment-708958)
doesn't have a posting with the text you quoted and I can't find that text
on the site. Can you send a link to the letter from Rossi you quoted?
Thanks.
[mg]
On Fri, May
Rossi is infuriating. And his caps lock key is stuck.
[mg]
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
No, that's all I had. Probably he deleted. Well, I hope someone else
printed the screen...
2013/5/31 Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com
Daniel,
The link you
Even though I'm still wearing my skeptic's hat (that's the one with the
propeller on top) isn't the argument about the need for calorimetry made
irrelevant the amount of energy observed to have been generated? In other
words, even with more precise measurements the exact energy output couldn't
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:22 PM, DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
yes, calorimetry is not needed IF you believe the claims, methods, and the
effect.
The claims are that the device produces significantly over unity, the
methods have been alluded to but Rossi is definitely not public with
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Ah, now we have it ... it's the questions of reproducability and
controlability,
But these questions have no bearing on whether the effect is real or not.
We're talking about
Might I suggest using a smaller point size and any typeface other than
Comic Sans (it's a typeface that give us type nerds bad dreams).
[mg]
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote:
But, seriously, that was an excellent description. Can you supply a link
to it?
:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Might I suggest using a smaller point size and any typeface other than
Comic Sans (it's a typeface that give us type nerds bad dreams).
I think Comic Sans is a perfect typeface for this list, since it scares
away anyone who
Are there any indications the Reifenschweiler effect produces excess heat
along with the decrease in radioactivity?
[m]
On Sunday, June 9, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not see where I can add a comment to that article in ColdFusionNow
but anyway, here are three papers from Otto:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
... Richard Aho … or “Smokie” CEO or MIST - tries to defend his device
to skeptics. It is not easy to do. There are many red flags and the
so-called testing stinks.
Now where have we heard that before ... ?
He may or
I've been following the endless arguments about how the tests could have
been rigged and it seems like every theory has been repeated over and over
again but no one who claims it's a fraud seems to be willing to admit they
just don't know even though they have no actual evidence of fraud and can't
[mg]
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
I've been following the endless arguments about how the tests could have
been rigged and it seems like every theory has been repeated over and over
again . . .
I have
I don't know if you ever looked at my fakes document (the lost post which
never DID show up ...)
Did you post that on Technobabble? I never saw anything like that ... only
the two posts we discussed.
[m]
The mere appearance of being normal doesn't mean someone is normal.
[mg]
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
It’s the weekend! Time for a brief break!
** **
For all those Vorts who might be interested in some OT far out
If it can be agreed that the IR measurements were, to within some
reasonable margin of error, accurately measuring output power then the only
issue in dispute is how much input power was provided. If, and this
obviously may not happen, Rossi were to allow another test and the only
point at which
Am I missing something here? Surely if the control cell is producing some
small amount of energy from an LENR process due to contamination but it's
less than that being produced by the experimental cell then while a
baseline might be hard or even impossible to establish wouldn't a
significant
was
not a reasonable explanation for the excess.
-Mark I
** **
*From:* mark.gi...@gmail.com [mailto:mark.gi...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark
Gibbs
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:31 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:MFMP cells in Europe and US now showing signs of
excess heat
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
