Rb 85 atom is 37 protons, 48 neutrons and 37 electrons (all fermions,
with spins 1/2 or -1/2), that's an even number of fermions (122) so
it's a boson atom (integer spin), even though it's nucleus is a
fermion.
However I believe I read (can't remember where) that in BECs of atoms,
the bosons are
2010/2/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
...
A single
SRI experiment has been published that made strong efforts to recover all
the helium, and it came up with, as I recall, about 25 MeV.
That experiment was discussed in the paper submitted by Hagelstein,
McKubre et al to the DOE in
, they requires cold
bosons for their formation. Head-on collisions may be a plausible
mechanism for deuteron kinetic energy removal.
Michel
On Feb 7, 2010, at 2:58 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/2/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@loma xdesi gn.com:
...
A single
SRI experiment has been published
Hi Horace, sorry for the late response, my comments below.
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2010/2/7 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does* dissolve the
Pd
surface
Nice post Abd. Just a terminology detail, I don't think Q factor is
adequate for the heat released by a reaction. Q factor is a
dimensionless factor used in resonance phenomena. I think you really
mean Q value.
Michel
2010/2/11 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
In a mail sent out,
2010/2/14 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
With a printable cell which does not use tellurium nor indium:
http://www.physorg.com/news185093054.html
Only at the sample stage, and printed in pure nitrogen rather than
air, but nice! They had the good idea to make the technical paper
freely
2010/2/16 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote:
Only at the sample stage, and printed in pure nitrogen rather than
air, but nice!
Air is already 70% nitrogen. All we need do is remove the impurities. :-)
78% actually
The authors might be well placed to answer that, you'll find their
email addresses on the paper:
http://eprints.iisc.ernet.in/12432/1/Lochon_Catalyzed_D-D_Fusion.pdf
2010/2/17 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Enquiring minds want to know:
1) How does a Lochon differ from a Cooper pair ?
2)
But Rich, like others who mentioned this before (as I recall Mike
Carrell did), is right that the component of the internal field due to
the *externally* applied DC Electric field in some SPAWAR experiments,
through insulating walls, should rapidly reach zero in the electrolyte
and stay there.
I
2010/2/23, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
...
Therefore ion motion in the electrolyte proper is mostly
due to random walk and concentration gradients.
...
The ion motion is due to a force, what kind of force do you think, the
concentration gradient force? It's of course an electric force,
Hi Horace,
Another typo: Frick instead of Fick.
All these macroscopic phenomena you discuss regarding the motion of
ions in an electrolyte boil down, at the atomic scale, to the electric
force, don't you agree?
In any case, in a dense conductor, whether liquid or solid or even a
dense gas such
Hi Jed, many thanks for this, but aren't there many other ICCF
proceedings missing? According to your special collections page at
http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/Introduction.htm
you only have ICCF-10, ICCF-11 and ICCF-12 complete, and selected
papers of ICCF-9
Michel
2010/2/27 Jed
2010/3/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Alexander Hollins, who also uses Gmail, wrote:
No, I did not see that particular email. [the Teller paper in HTML format]
I saw it, even though I use gmail too. I wonder if this because I have
your email address in my gmail contacts. Do you? Does
Hi Jones,
Thanks for the interesting story. According to Google the document you
quoted from is this DOD report:
http://dodfuelcell.cecer.army.mil/library_items/Thermo(2004).pdf
The link doesn't seem to be working right now, but the text remains
available via Google's cache:
Rouge, red, rosso/rossi, thought it was a multilingual pun ;)
2010/3/13, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I wrote -- and I mean typed, not dictated:
These rouge researchers don't make it any easier to trust them, do they?
Also the rogue ones.
A rouge researcher would be one who wears
Interesting, but why would Focardi discredit his own work?
2010/3/14, Steven Krivit stev...@newenergytimes.com:
Ladies and gentlemen,
The truth is, I plead, to a large degree, ignorance of this FocardiRossi
matter.
It had been originally brought to my attention as a patent, and then I
2010/3/14 Steven Krivit stev...@newenergytimes.com:
At 02:35 AM 3/14/2010, you wrote:
Interesting, but why would Focardi discredit his own work?
I don't think he would want to.
Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it? Or one
would have to imagine that Focardi himself
If they have equal shares in this work, why isn't Focardi on the patent?
Michel
2010/3/15, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it?
No. The authors are aware of this paper. It is really their work.
Or one
Jed, have you tried the clearscan setting in Adobe Acrobat 9 OCR?
Very impressive.
They explain their clever (and obvious, in retrospect) trick in this
demo video: http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p28891758/
Michel
Are you sure of the gender?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea
In Italy and Albania, Andrea is a masculine name, the equivalent of Andrew.
Michel
2010/3/16 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
...
As I mentioned, Rossi told me they are working hard on new publications and
they plan to divulge
Nothing mysterious about this circuit, it's a silly boost converter
without a load. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boost_converter
2010/3/18 Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com:
- Original Message
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com;
One can download Acrobat 9 from their web site and try it for a month for free.
Disappointingly, the accuracy of the recognition itself is not better
with this clearscan option, it's just the look. However, thanks to the
zoomable (vector) nature of the clearscan characters, if you convert a
- Original Message
From: Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 10:46:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram
Ok, I gave him the wiki reference.
Harry
- Original
Message
From: Michel Jullian
ymailto=mailto:michelj...@gmail.com;
href
2010/3/19 Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com:
... if you convert a
clearscan pdf back to image format in higher resolution e.g. 600 dpi
(this can be set in editpreferencesconvert from pdfTIFFedit
settings), make a new pdf from that, and re-do an OCR on it,
interestingly the recognition
2:
http://tinyurl.com/ycw4xm4
with operating principles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boost_converter
Harry
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 4:54:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram
2010/3/19
What a jerk. On that page alone, he says one loads palladium into
deuterium, and platinum too, and he professes that excess heat is the
bad kind of cold fusion!
2010/3/19 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
D. Goodstein, On Fact and Fraud: Cautionary Tales from the Front Lines of
Science
, but I suppose that doesn't matter either?
harry
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 1:42:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram
The capacitor on your photo 2 is in parallel with the battery so it's
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
At 02:00 PM 3/19/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
What a jerk. On that page alone, he says one loads palladium into
deuterium, and platinum too, and he professes that excess heat is the
bad kind of cold fusion!
You know, he points out that it is not fraud
Which voltage?
2010/3/20, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com:
yes.
You are aware that the the voltage keeps rises even after the battery is
disconnected.
harry
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, March 20, 2010 3:59:08
2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Someone asked me what I mean by independent evaluations of the claims. I
mean that outside experts plan to go into the lab and observe the
experiments, the way Rob Duncan looked at Energetics Technologies.
Such an evaluation is not foolproof, as
anniversary of our field- and only the
Patterson
system in its day of glory was comparable to these claims- if I remember
correctly.
Is some other breakthrough of this type hidden somewhere?
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell jedrothw
there).
On 03/21/2010 11:56 AM, Michel Jullian
wrote:
Wait a minute, I see no cap attached to the output on Harry's
diagram
photo 2discussed here (haven't followed the other
discussions), only
one capacitor on the input side, in parallel with the
battery until
the latter is disconnected, which
2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Such an evaluation is not foolproof, as even if the experimental setup is
made fully open to the experts and they find nothing wrong with it (heating
resistor current as advertised etc), there is no way to be sure
2010/3/21 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
Merci beaucoup, Michel...
My interest is in technology and this resurrection or rejuvenation of the
Piantelli system
is the first really interesting event after many years. It is a great
mystery what has happened between 1994 and 2008, it is
out with technology! that means you need the know how
elements, you have to respect the rules.. Is there a French ~equivalent for
that?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/3/21 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
Merci beaucoup, Michel...
My
2010/3/23 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
You need not worry about that sort of thing.
I have been in contact with
both parties,
and they have already taken apart the cells.
Which parties?
Please ask me again in 3 months.
I thought you didn't want to know
that the
professional principles and rules have to be respected strictly. Dura lex,
sed lex in technology too
Oh, I get it now! Quite true!
Michel
Peter.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Peter,
Let me see if I understand, you believe the Rossi
2010/3/23 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
You missed my point about Scott/Earthtech, which is not that they have a
more sensitive calorimeter (which for kW level power is irrelevant I agree),
but that they can perform an _independent_ measurement of the device
and many other
things from the realm of engineering.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/3/23 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
Dear Michel,
Yes it is based on trust, I could not visit these labs- but I will try
to,
this summer.
But this trust
2010/3/23 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
If I was the inventor, I would take my cold fusion cell, *as a black
box to preserve my secrets*, to whatever authority accepts to test it
I do not think there is any chance that would work. I have never seen a cold
fusion
...@gmail.com wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
It is less independent than using a fresh cathode and
your own cell.
Which, since you don't really know what makes the original cell work,
is even harder than moving the original cell.
We know what makes the cells work. With bulk Pd the control
Fits with your 159 IQ.
Back on topic, I understand why you are mad at Steve krivit for
pushing his POV that the heat/helium = 24 MeV/He is bogus, that's
because that correlation is what made you believe CF might well be
real. You don't want to doubt again.
Michel
2010/3/24 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
I'll remind, just in case it isn't clear for everybody, that for every
two Ds which will have disappeared and every He which will have
appeared, 24 MeV of energy will have been released in any case,
_whatever the intermediary or concurrent reactions if any_.
The energy released by a nuclear
No wonder, the cold fusion experimenters say my cell makes excess
heat but they won't let skeptics see it with their own calorimeter.
Michel
2010/3/25 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I should have added --
Nothing like what I have described has happened so far because no one in the
Hi, Peter-in-the-grave :) Since CF is a surface effect, how about
plating just a few microns of Pd onto some cheaper metal?
2010/3/26 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
Nice to hear from you, Terry. The trouble is that 0.1 mm is too thin, Pd
overheats, melts- losses, problems etc. Can you
2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
No wonder, the cold fusion experimenters say my cell makes excess
heat but they won't let skeptics see it with their own calorimeter.
So, you would not believe the Wright brothers unless they let you fly their
airplane
26, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, Peter-in-the-grave :) Since CF is a surface effect, how about
plating just a few microns of Pd onto some cheaper metal?
2010/3/26 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
Nice to hear from you, Terry. The trouble is that 0.1 mm
2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
So, you would not believe the Wright brothers unless they let you fly
their
airplane?
A better analogy is that I would not believe them unless I saw them
flying it with my own eyes.
If that is what you want, you
jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Duncan didn't bring in his own measurement system so he didn't see the
excess heat for himself.
Oh give me a break.
That's ridiculous. The technique was replicated as SRI and ENEA. CBS sent
one of the world top experts in calorimetry to confirm
2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Are there any published works showing nuclear phenomena such as excess
heat, correlated with deuterium percentage? I'm starting with 99.9% D2O
(atom percent D). What would be the difference I should expect with 98%
2010/3/27 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
At 07:39 AM 3/26/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
No wonder, the cold fusion experimenters say my cell makes excess
heat but they won't let skeptics see it with their own calorimeter.
I intend to fix that, you know.
Good. Obviously, common
Friends,
I object to the heavy Krivit bashing, it is not called for, even if
the evidence for the 24MeV heat/He was solid enough which I don't
think it is. And he is free to present his graphs as he pleases in his
slides, especially if he directs the reader to a more complete graph
elsewhere.
In
2010/3/31 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
Sent from my iPhone
Not a valid excuse ;-)
On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact, I was wondering, who cares about the heat, helium production
alone is an indisputable proof of LENRs, isn't
energy measurement
on the same number of cells. And, even more importantly, it could be
easily analyzed or even run in a skeptic's lab.
Michel
2010/4/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
At 05:02 AM 4/2/2010, Michel Jullian wrote:
Re Stephen's argument that it can be argued that He can leak
2010/4/9 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
...
I.e., radioactive decay. Come to think of that, isn't
this LENR? After all, nuclear, and takes place at low temperatures
Good point.
(I've never seen anyone use LENR to refer to radioactive decay, mostly
because something that happens
Jed, it seems the way it performs depends on the original document's
characteristics (resolution, fonts, multiplicity of fonts maybe?). In
the case of the Feynman Lectures on Physics, volume 3 (quantum
mechanics), of which I made a searchable backup of my print version
from an image format pdf
believe that's possible in Acrobat) maybe it's safer to stick to the
less glamorous but more faithful searchable image format for now.
Michel
2010/4/11 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Jed, it seems the way it performs depends on the original document's
characteristics
Hi Jed,
It looks great indeed! To change D20 in D2O use the standard method to
edit ClearScan text, I just tried it and it worked for me: using the
touchup text tool select the 0 in D20, right click, select
properties, change the special font to a system font e.g. Arial bold,
close the dialog box
9.0
2010/5/5 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Michel Jullian wrote:
To change D20 in D2O use the standard method to
edit ClearScan text, I just tried it and it worked for me: using the
touchup text tool select the 0 in D20, right click, select
properties, change the special font
If I understand correctly, the role of such a catalyst is to reduce
activation energy, thus bringing the reaction's energy consumption
closer to its theoretical minimum, see e.g. :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrocatalyst
An electrocatalyst is a catalyst that participates in electrochemical
2010/5/7 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I wrote:
Wait a minute. Why should I care about two people, who are both
wrong . . .
Who said I care? . . .
Seriously, let us grant that Krivit is right in this instance. Shanahan is
smart but he went off the rails a long time ago, with an
No Abd, Shanahan may be wrong on many points but the equivalent to
many atmospheres of hydrogen gas pressure exposure assertion is
correct, it is even a gross understatement, in the PF original paper
they computed something like 10^26 atm IIRC. That's electrolytic
compression: if you use a hollow
2010/5/10 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
Michel,
Can you cite the reference for this kind of bursting tube, due to internal
pressurization, having being actually performed?
Some electrolytic compressor literature:
1/ Arata
-
Method of producing ultrahigh pressure gas (US
2010/5/16 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Curiously, they call this phone Nexus and despite Nexis having been around a
lot longer – google got their version into my spell-checker somehow.
Either that, or your spell-checker knows more words than you do ;-)
Youtube - Single electron double slit wave experiment (1mn video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ-0PBRuthc
http://www.hitachi.com/rd/research/em/doubleslit.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment#When_observed_emission_by_emission
Dear all,
In my understanding, even though I haven't seen it expressed this way
elsewhere, dielectric breakdown is what happens to the so-called
Helmholtz double layer capacitor's insulator (the water monolayer
separating the cathode's surface electron layer from the first layer
of electrolyte
Hoyt,
I see no explanation for cars costing less than freight, but regarding
the multifunction printer, what they make money on is replacement ink
cartridges. Razor and blade business model.
Michel
2010/10/3, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt.stea...@gmail.com:
Summary: I should be able to buy a
PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: weight and charge
Harry wasn't kidding Michel. He knows this from his experience
moonlighting as a speed-bump at WalMart.
Fred
[Original Message]
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex
/24/06, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well spotted Terry, if you zoom in on the dirigible you can see very clearly
that the photo has been faked :)
Either for fun, or maybe to hide what was visible at that place on the
original photo?
Interesting! The people who live here own
Q1. Doesn't the ramp just steal pennies from our petrol tanks?
A1. The ramp is designed to be situated in parts of the roadway where
vehicles are having to slow down anyway, for example on downhill
gradients, when approaching traffic lights or roundabouts as well as
being used to replace
It's definitely faked. Zoom in and look at the outline of the blimp.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Nick Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: [OT] Google Maps Easter Eggs
I'm not so sure that it was faked. If
If you wish, but not with speed bumps please ;-)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: The Toroid Railroad Generator
Great idea...but I think extracting energy from
Interesting, but surely if the vacuum thus created was significant your Al foil
would be sucked in until no space remains between it and the glass?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 7:39 AM
Subject:
You could be right Stephen but don't you agree the outline of the blimp looks
quite unnatural? Much worse than ordinary image compression artefacts I would
say.
Congratulations for your web site BTW!
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Indeed it does.
Hi Terry, for another opinion Stephen could have a look at the controversy you
and I had about this some time ago, I had found what looked very much like a
large error in input current measurement by analysing the Mosfet's voltage
waveform and applying Ohm's low to it knowing
-
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Interesting News About Steorn
On 11/28/06, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed it does.
Hi Terry, for another opinion Stephen could have a look
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Sprain motor
On 11/29/06, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry wrote:
... others have confirmed
the measurements since your
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: weight and charge
Yes that is true, but I am positing a slight weight loss when
travelling horizontally and while remaining in contact
Ah, so you're admitting the current version is not OU. Gotcha ;-)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Sprain motor
On 11/29/06, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
potentially lethal 200,000 volt
Hi Fred,
20mJ is only between perceptible sensation and definite shock. It takes
10,000mJ to die it seems.
http://www.jci.co.uk/Electrostatics/Wshop-04.pdf
DischargeResponse:
energy(mJ)
1mJperceptible sensation
10mJ definite shock
100mJ
Oops should have been between definite shock and unpleasant shock. Beware
that the thing will be capable of arcing at your fingers from about 200mm away
(~1mm/kV).
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 07
This made me wonder how much electrical energy would be thus stored in this
Earth-atmosphere capacitor:
C*V^2/2=q*V/2 = (28 440 * 300 000) / 2 = 4 266 000 000 = 4.3*10^9 J
This is two orders of magnitude less than the 4.3*10^11 J order of magnitude
estimate at page 20 of this physics lecture
Indeed Robin, as you wrote some time ago, the small radii of the hydrinos
(shrunken H atoms) if they exist would facilitate the close encounters required
for fusion.
This reminds me I had promised Fred I would post a derivation of allowed
(unshrunken) circular electron orbits radii in Bohr's
Constant, Alpha?
Fred
Michel Jullian wrote.
Indeed Robin, as you wrote some time ago, the small radii of the
hydrinos
(shrunken H atoms) if they exist would facilitate the close encounters
required for fusion.
This reminds me I had promised Fred I would post a derivation of allowed
There are loads of radio sources more powerful than the cosmic background out
there, and the cosmic background is ubiquitous as you said so you wouldn't
expect a daily variation.
As discussed here several times before, extracting electrical energy from radio
waves to power an electrical device
It's OK Robin, it happens to me all the time :)
Your other point is valid though, we don't know how long it takes the Sun to
charge this capacitor. But it's unlikely it charges it in one two millionth of
a day = 43 ms, which would be required for it to provide the world's daily
energy
Your multiple wraps before reconnection scheme makes sense Robin, indeed if
the trajectory only repeats after several non-circular circuits the total
length of which remains a multiple of the De Broglie wavelength, then no
destructive self-interference occurs. If one admits such a possibility
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 12/20/06, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean reduce resistance?
For a given
Fred wrote:
Bain buried plates of zinc and copper in the ground about one meter apart and
used the resulting voltage, of about one volt, to operate a clock.
This looks like a galvanic cell to me, with the earth acting as a porous
electrolyte reservoir. A ZnCu cell has a 1.1V voltage:
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 3:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Going Van de Graaff
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:05:29 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
It's OK Robin, it happens
, December 23, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: T. H.Moray's Energy Device
According to the article the material can replate itself?
Michel Jullian wrote,
Fred wrote:
Bain buried plates of zinc and copper in the ground about one meter
apart and
used the resulting voltage, of about
Fred, earth to space tethers are a very promising area of research (space
elevators etc.). Might be the best bet for a 50km conductive wire indeed. The
technology is more speculative than balloons though :)
David, no magnetic field gradient is needed, the Lorentz force also exists in a
uniform
Hi Stephen, it won't take that long if Nanosolar, mentioned by Terry in an
earlier post, delivers as they seem poised to do since they have secured 100
million dollars of financing and are going into production in 2007, cf:
http://www.nanosolar.com/articles.htm
What they seem to have achieved
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Musings on grid-independence and personal alternative energy
thomas malloy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
John Steck wrote:
Their setup with the electron irradiated copper ball reminds me of inertial
fusion with the laser irradiated DT pellets/balls.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 4:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re:
high-energy beam will be dangerous.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold fusion powered rockets
Michel Jullian wrote:
Aren't photon rockets supposed
A rocket supplied with energy beamed from a space power
transmitter should get as much momentum reaction from its
fuel mass as possible so relativistic beams are suitable
here if the accelerator is very light. The power
transmitter can send out relativistic particle beams
rather than
Good point, but the process may take longer than desirable.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: removing junk [Re moving satellites]
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s
BTW such Moon station based light beams might also be useful to deviate space
junk into, and threatening asteroids out of, an earth intersecting orbit. Not
to mention earth uses such as night lighting of disaster areas.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED
A good idea but then it's a different beast altogether, it's a classical
scanning laser display, and you must have only one steerable (or rotating
multifaceted, one facet per line) mirror per laser source, not an array of
micromirrors. The problem with scanning laser displays is that for a
1 - 100 of 1253 matches
Mail list logo
