In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:10:05 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
According to the e-cat team, if you don\t cool it, there will be some
strong gamma emissions.
Even that would be acceptable for a device that was well protected (i.e.
centralized power plants), provided that the
In reply to Angela Kemmler's message of Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:18:33 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
He uses a metering pump by manufacturer LMI (UK). Its model P18. Lewan told it.
http://www.lmi-pumps.com/datasheets/Pseries-08-01.pdf
max 3.20 GPH (12.1 l/h) 22 psi (1.5 Bar)
max stroke frequency = 100 / minute
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:19:34 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
It cannot raise water more than 3 milimeters. That sort of rubber, I
made some calculations elsewhere, does not radiate more than 25W per
meter. The steam must be dry to be pumped out.
You mention the hose
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:09:22 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The thermal conductivity of copper is 386 W/(m K), about 2700 times
that of rubber. Several meters of similar sized copper pipe coiled a
barrel of water at 75 C should easily condense 12 kW of steam.
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:20:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I was talking about running it above boiling, but way below the level needed
to boil it all. Different thing. And it's easy. The power can range within a
factor of 7. In this case, anywhere between 600W and about 5
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:21:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Multiverse M Brane intersection?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2008161/Ghostly-mirage-appears-river-Huanshan-City-China.html
I find it surprising that no one appears to have made an effort to actually
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:28:30 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I'm somewhat surprised that no one tries Lanthanum alloys, since these are used
for Hydrogen storage, implying high loading.
An unusual predicament is lurking in the background of the field of LENR,
due to Rossi's
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:55:49 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Many cosmological theories presume the pixel size of the universe is
the Planck Length (1.616 x 10^-35 m). This limits the amount of
information contained in a black hole by one theory. It also limits
the amount
In reply to Jouni Valkonen's message of Fri, 1 Jul 2011 22:04:38 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
We just need to find better theories that can explain CMB!
I suspect that the CMB is actually just remnant degraded starlight. IOW all the
infrared that bodies radiate into space interacts with space dust, gas,
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:23:13 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Based upon conversion of only Ni62 Ni64 to Cu63 Cu65 respectively, an
electrical energy value of 5 cents / kWh (@30% conversion efficiency), I
calculate a Ni value of $2085/kg. The current price of Ni is
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:14:40 -0700:
Hi,
I suspect that instead of controlled he meant checked. The Dutch word
kontroleren means to check. and a similar situation may exist with
Swedish/Norwegian (due to the Norse/Germanic origin of the Dutch language).
Here's
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:14:40 -0700:
Hi,
I suspect that instead of controlled he meant checked. The Dutch word
kontroleren means to check. and a similar situation may exist with
Swedish/Norwegian (due to the Norse/Germanic origin of the Dutch language).
Here's
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:09:53 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Not photoshoped, but a good visual effects video. Probably promotional
viral video for some movie, in the style first person style of amateur
filming like Blair Witch Project or Cloverfield ... I LOVE THESE KINDS
OF
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:24:19 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Another tidbit, but from part 1 of 2...
The post-reaction analysis shows a copper isotope ratio of Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 1.6,
while the natural
occurrence show a ratio of Cu 63/Cu 65 ~ 2.24 which is a statistically
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:33:15 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The tubercles are essential in order for the reaction rate to reach levels
high enough for the
implied total power output per volume or mass to reach orders of magnitude
kW/kg - this level of
power density is
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:22:30 +1000:
Hi,
Oops! Having never heard of tubercles, I just assumed it was a language problem!
It was - mine! :(
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:33:15 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The tubercles are essential in
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:08:15 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Everything would be OK, if and when Defkalion would show us a small army of
Hyperions, working at their site. They told me on the forum that they have
already tested combinations of max 6 devices in the kW range and
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:02:26 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
But Robin, how about the 2nd half of that excerpt, where the optimal
grain-size is more than a
micrometer, not nanometers... I would think that a 'tubercle', which is likely
composed of numerous
'grains', would be
In reply to Akira Shirakawa's message of Sun, 24 Jul 2011 03:05:30 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
On 2011-07-24 02:11, Terry Blanton wrote:
Celani:
17:32 - Explain how the principles of cold fusion, well known and
known in military areas, are used in the production of micro-tactical
nuclear bombs.
I
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:06:24 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2021174/Have-scientists-crashed-flying-saucer-seabed.html#ixzz1Torn51mJ
There is one obvious natural phenomenon that is circular - a volcanic crater -
also not unknown
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:37:17 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Like Art's Parts, these artifacts of the Roswell crash show isotopic anomalies:
http://www.openminds.tv/test-confirms-roswell-debris-733/
We had always planned to check small animal lairs if we ever had a
chance
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 1 Aug 2011 19:22:34 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
This reminds me of a pre 17th century argument that the Earth cannot be
turning.
As everyone knows if the Earth was turning then the ground would move away
from you whenever you jumped in the air. However
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:53:08 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Vortex-l
I am not sure IF my thoughts on Rossi and DKL are even
logical
BUT what if a major world
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:28:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I'll render a guess that it's KaCO3.
I suggested NaOH months ago (just before Dennis Cravens stopped contributing. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:50:06 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
It does not matter if it worked extremely well or moderately well. The
testing was for safety- not performance.
[snip]
Actually it might. If there is a small amount of radioactivity associated with
operation, it
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:38:13 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Actually the old argument is correct, in concept, but wrong in magnitude.
In order to come down in exactly the same spot (assuming a perfectly vertical
jump), one would have to maintain the same angular
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:11:24 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Correction.
Value for strontium is wrong. Thanks Rob.
Looks like Moly is the best.
The best fit has to be Hydrogen itself, which is exact. However that said, it
should in reality depend on the temperature, because
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:39:52 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Potassium is perhaps the most mentioned candidate in the papers, but the
first two IP electrons are at 4.34 and 31.63 eV. What this means
essentially is that the hole only appears when the K(2+) ion takes back the
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I found this link on the Cold Fusion Times website.
What powers the laser that heats the thorium? Is this a parody?
Harry
http://wardsauto.com/ar/thorium_power_car_110811/A U.S. company says it is
getting
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:37:37 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Now he has shown how you can make and not make contracts
and agreements in the same time..
...sounds like quantum contract! :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:57:38 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
It doesn't seem likely that the tubules themselves are actually composed
of nickel, although it is possible. But whatever they are composed of - they
would serve the purpose of 'ventilation' of a lattice-like
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:03:11 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin,
I have a third ionization energy of 43.6 eV which gives:-
Where did this value turn up?
In a periodic table program that I have called, not surprisingly, Periodic
Table from SMI corp.
(However web
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:04:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:08 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
All of which means that for any given catalyst there is also an ideal
operating
temperature (where the number of molecules with the correct kinetic
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:17:07 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
http://terralab.tripod.com/id14.html
Quote from http://terralab.tripod.com/atmospheric_water_generator.html
LARGE-SCALE WATER PRECIPITATION INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS FROM $287,000.00 for 35,000
Gallons a day; To
In reply to noone noone's message of Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:18:32 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Krivit and other worshippers of Widom Larsen theory do not make any sense. The
reaction is not a weak interaction, but a fusion reaction. The neutrons are
supposed to be protons and electrons that become
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:32:03 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Using a mean earth diameter of 6371 km, a mean albedo of 0.3, and
solar insolation of 1 W/m^2, we have a reflected power of:
Solar insolation is around 1 kW (not 1 W) / m^2.
P = (6.371x10^6 m)^2 * Pi * 0.3
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:03:50 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The above should be:
P = (6.371x10^6 m)^2 * Pi * 0.3 * (1 kW/m^2) = 3.8x10^16 W
This puts HAARP about 7 orders of magnitude less.
Thanks for the correction.
You're welcome. BTW, though HAARP may have a
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:27:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
To summarize, if we decide to live more or less the way we do now, consuming
about as much energy per capita as we do now, with roughly as much
transportation, space-heating, illumination, data transmission and so
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:09:17 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I get it, said Adell. Dont shout. When the sun is done, the other stars
will be gone, too.
This is of course not true. New stars are being born all the time.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:07:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Peter Gluck wrote:
But Xanthi Press wrote no testing by State authorities no
plant. Confusing.
The Sept. 1 report said they do not have a license for the plant yet.
Defkalion confirmed they are still working on
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:44:06 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I don't see why they would need to store any Hydrogen. They could just
produce
it on demand through electrolysis. If they can't do this then the device is
worthless anyway.
It is a
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:24:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Over the long haul, it's going to need to come from electrolysis anyway.
That's
where most of our hydrogen is. It doesn't need to cause explosions if done
correctly.
Of course. Over
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:05:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
That would be fine. Some people have suggested that the units should be sold
with individual electrolyzers, so that they could be loaded with water
instead of hydrogen. That would be a bad idea.
[snip]
I was one of
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:43:10 -0800:
An on-board electrolyser can even deliver hydrogen at high pressure,
by using a Pd cathode and driving the hydrogen out the back side of
the cathode. Commercial electrolysers that use this technique save
money and
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Fri, 16 Sep 2011
19:52:38 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Google used 2.3 megawatt-hours of juice in 2010...enough to
power Salt Lake City.
This works out to an average power of 262 W. Somehow I doubt the figure is
accurate. ;)
Regards,
Robin van
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:33:50
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I now want to see the following experiment:
- Hold a single H atom in a fixture so that it is not physically
touching anything else. This can be done in a vacuum chamber and using
electric and/or
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:07:14
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The higher frequency e- oscillations of the inner e- shells means they are
traversing the nucleus more frequently, thus, creating a stronger coupling
to the proton oscillations in the nucleus, and
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:07:14
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
What are the ends of the dipole? Getting back to the above paragraph of just
whats oscillating
and the aether being under tremendous stress/tension,
perhaps one end of the dipole is a region of higher
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:07:14
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
In a free H atom, in a vacuum chamber, not influenced by outside objects or
fields, but due to subtle interactions with the proton oscillations, the e-
oscillation will randomly rotate about that center
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:12:09 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In fact, the questions aren't nonsense; they just need to be carefully
posed to get sensible answers out of them in a universe where SR applies.
There is a distinguished frame for the universe: The rest
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:13:44
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
CLOUD has already made several important discoveries. First, the experiment
has shown that the most likely nucleating vapours, sulphuric acid and
ammonia, cannot account for the nucleation that is observed
In reply to Mattia Rizzi's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:31:58 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
The precise calculation of the output ***thermal energy in Kwh per hour***,
which the reactor produces through the exothermal nuclear reaction of
NICKEL-HYDROGEN.
Look at image:
In reply to Mattia Rizzi's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:31:58 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
PS -
Try reading it like this:
9,412 Kwh/h *** ENERGY produced in a hour *** during the
or if it makes it clearer,
9,412 Kwh/h *** ENERGY produced per hour *** during the
(Energy per unit time = power).
phase
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:35:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The most energy dense chemical fuel is liquid oxygen and hydrogen which
combines to form water. It produces 285,800 J per mole. One mole of water is
16 g.
Make that 18 grams. (16 for the Oxygen and 2 for the
In reply to peter.heck...@arcor.de's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:59:38 +0200
(CEST):
Hi,
[snip]
Hello,
I became aware that I repeatedly sent mails directly to list members.
This was done in error.
When Im at work I can only use a rather poor HTML online mail program.
When I hit Reply on a
In reply to Akira Shirakawa's message of Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:43:40 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
On 2011-10-04 19:18, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
More from New Energy Times on this matter:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/10/06/nasa-wont-confirm-relationship-with-rossi-2/
You cant deliver
In reply to peter.heck...@arcor.de's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:04:06 +0200
(CEST):
Hi,
[snip]
I dont see this as a problem. It would be very fine if there is /repeatable/
evidence for anomalous heat.
If there is enough excess heat that cannot be explained conventionally then
this is a
In reply to Robert Leguillon's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:19:37 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
1 MW is used as a measure of power transfer. The velocity of steam, through a
given opening, produced by 1 MW cannot be calculated; too few required
variables are populated.
You would have to know beginning and
In reply to Michele Comitini's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:05:38 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
By sailing to the New World, Christopher Columbus and the other
explorers who followed may have set off a chain of events that cooled
Europes climate for centuries.
short: http://goo.gl/Gl82A
long:
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:37:53 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
It is extremely easy to prove within a few seconds that any of these devices
work, without any kind of calorimetry, water heat or steam. Take it to the
neutrino detector in Gran Sasso, Italy. The neutrino emission
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:16:30 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
The best part here it is that they indeed confirm that Rossi is lying about
they not having the necessary know-how to make the core WOW!
2011/10/15 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:12:40 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
According to Rossi, Nickel transmutes to Copper and it decays to Nickel
again by beta decay, so there is neutrino emission.
This assumes that Rossi et al actually do know which reactions are taking place.
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:15:43 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
That's what I understand by reading this... Even though, we intend to
support papers with results supported by the measurements from *new
instruments **we had to develop in order to control* and further develop the
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:30:34 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Who said they need the catalyst?
I think the fact that they are still being nice to Rossi implies that they need
something.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:37:46 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
BTW, have you been able to discern anything interesting from the BLP CIHT
patent? I seem to recall in that your last comment on the
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:47:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
As I said, efficiency does not matter, but longevity and the lifetime cost
of the equipment does matter. See chapter 14 of my book.
Efficiency does matter for two reasons.
1) Nickel availability.
2) Global
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:11:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The only part I do not get is: Why 1 MW? 10 kW is just as persuasive. There
is probably a ~$500 billion marketplace for small reactors, say from 1 to 50
kW.
Current world population is about 7 billion. Divided by
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Sun, 23 Oct 2011
20:55:48 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Catalyst will flood the nickel cells at T minus 13 minutes.
...so the catalyst is a gas. :)
..any bets on which one?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:54:51
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
In this example, the laser pulse of energy into the material gets coupled in
thru the electrons (the first thing encountered since they effectively are a
shield around the nucleus), but then that energy
In reply to David Roberson's message of Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:10:37 -0400 (EDT):
Hi David,
[snip]
I suggest you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betavoltaics
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:11:46 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
I would suggest that someone over at Rossi's blog ask Rossi for information
on Domenico Fiorvanati. State the request simply and politely.
I
In reply to David ledin's message of Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:50:20 +0330:
Hi,
[snip]
NASA: LENR powered aircraft so large that other aircraft can land on
them in future.
http://www.slashgear.com/nuclear-powered-aircraft-so-large-other-aircraft-can-land-on-them-in-our-future-25190555/
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:19:49 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Efficiency does matter for two reasons.
1) Nickel availability.
2) Global warming.
Nope.
1. Even at very low efficiency this would only require a tiny fraction
of the available
In reply to Danny Ross Lunsford's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:27:58 -0700
(PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
You can forget the hydrino. It does no good to adhere to bad ideas. Angular
momentum conservation prevents it. We need to use good physics to get to the
bottom of this phenomenon, and ruthlessly
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:15:21 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Lawandy also claims the electron is mirrored in an adjacent dielectric not
orbital.
Lawandy bases his concept upon the notion of a surface. However at the density
he hopes to achieve, the spacing between positive
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:15:21 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
When the electron is not bound in a periodic motion of some kind around the
nucleus, there is NO orbital.
This describes the case when ordinary QM applies.
When there is no orbital there can be NO fractional
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:15:21 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
IOW yes there are electrons in the general vicinity, which balance the
electrostatic charge of protons or deuterons, but according to Miley the
electrons in IRH are not located in orbitals around the protons -
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:32:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Ever since Arata introduced this technique I have felt it is probably more
practical and better than electrochemical loading. It is a little
surprising that it works at all, because most people say that loading
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:44:58 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Does anyone understand what happens to one of these fractional Rydberg
hydrogen atoms once it is released into the atmosphere? Does it gain energy
from the air and become standard hydrogen? I am just
In reply to Danny Ross Lunsford's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:46:34 -0700
(PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Fractional Rydberg? That's nonsense too - this isn't chemistry, it's not
electrons. It's nucleons. The key point is that nickel 62 is at the peak of
the binding-energy-per-nucleon curve. Somehow I
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:38:36 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Somehow inverse Rydberg matter
may be formed between and among these tubules with the help of the high
pressure and temperature of the hydrogen envelop and the mediating action
of an alkaline catalyst.
When did we
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 2 Nov 2011 09:12:47 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
That is the question that I would like to have answered. Would the hydrino be
able to acquire the needed energy from the thermal energy available of the
atmosphere? If not, why have not all of the
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:37:00 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Thank you for the response. The hydrino cycle that I am describing, aka heat
pump of some unusual type, would allow energy contained within the thermal
surroundings to do work. I can imagine some of that
Hi,
It just occurred to me that in IRH the proton is revolving very fast around the
electron. The back of an envelope yields a kinetic energy of 291 eV. With that
amount of kinetic energy, and at that orbital frequency, it may have a chance of
tunneling into another nucleus in a reasonable time,
In reply to Danny Ross Lunsford's message of Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:33:53 -0700
(PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
This is sort of what seems most natural to me. Something is happening on
either side of NI62, and it gets into a cyclic state - once in a while by the
magic of QM it overshoots and you get copper, or
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 5 Nov 2011 21:03:06 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
IRH sounds like an atomic version of a geocentric solar system.
Indeed! :)
Harry
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:47 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Hi,
It just occurred to me that in IRH the proton is revolving very
In reply to Berke Durak's message of Fri, 4 Nov 2011 22:06:25 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
If the assumption is that Ni64 is the only isotope that is reacting, then
clearly the reaction itself is already selective of that isotope. So why bother
enriching at all? Just use native Ni, and let the reaction
In reply to Berke Durak's message of Sat, 5 Nov 2011 22:03:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
So why bother enriching at all?
Rossi himself stated that the fuel is enriched, and that the energy
cost for enriching
it for a 1 MW set of reactor is (only!) 200 W.h.
By analogy with
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:06:41 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
*IMO* Rossi just said that enrichment took place to throw others off the trail,
and because he had only just discovered that reactions with isotopes other than
Ni62 Ni64 produce gammas which can't be easily
In reply to pagnu...@htdconnect.com's message of Sat, 5 Nov 2011 23:35:00 -0400
(EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Probably, Robin, but the relatively recent discovery of the 65Fe isomer
(which likely has been lurking in the universe for a long time) makes me
wonder if other long-lived isomers have escaped
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 7 Nov 2011 02:44:15 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
*D(-1) is the excited state of D(1) where protons and electrons chance
places when sufficient kinetic energy is added to the D(1) species to form
D(-1).*
The reduction in potential energy should more than compensate
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sun, 06 Nov 2011 12:09:05 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Now, assuming that the hypothesis is true, and proceeding in reverse
order, we could(I want to clarify that I would NOT do it):
- search for the geatest Internal Conversion Coefficients for a given
element.
- search
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:15:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
So, he just wrote AR a check and hooked the container up to his F250
and drove away? So, there wasn't a single investigative reporter who
hopped on their Vespa and followed him? Are we to believe that it now
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:19:28 -0200:
Hi,
[snip]
That's the rest mass of the electron... So, any idea?
This has already been extensively covered on Vortex since January. See the
archives (hint:positron).
2011/11/8 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
From Jeane
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:05:14 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Could be. Any experimental data? Specific to Rubidium-85?
Nope. That was just a snap judgement based on the binding energy curve,
which has iron at the extremum. In general, elements heavier than iron
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:25:46 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Note also that Rb87 (~27%) is a beta emitter with a very long half life. Perhaps
shrinking the BEC causes an acceleration of the beta decay?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:59:03 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
That's remarkably positive. Good!
- Jed
[snip]
I don't really agree. They are trying to explain away CF results with comic ray
muons, which is utter nonsense. That would explain energy production at the
level of
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:00:36 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
According to http://www.cosmicrays.org/ the muon flux at the surface is about
200 / m^2 / sec. Assuming each muon catalyzes 120 fusion reactions, and each
such reaction produces 23.8 MeV, we get a power
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:10:01 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Diurnal variations could come from many other factors such as the influence of
light on the reactor. Just because such variations may exist, doesn't
necessarily imply that muons are the primary cause CF reactions.
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:00:10 -0900:
Hi,
Neutron exchange reactions have been mentioned before, but perhaps proton
exchange is also possible. In which case you might have been right the first
time, since that reaction only requires the exchange (more
1 - 100 of 3253 matches
Mail list logo
