[Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR???
I don't know how to find this, not even in google Alan, what is SWAPAR Ban??? Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:06:53 -0800 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com From: a...@well.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap At 06:01 PM 2/1/2012, David Roberson wrote: They are expecting great things from fusion I see. Wonder what happened to the positive outlook that they expressed earlier? I think that the positive outlook is only two labs who seem to believe it, versus this report representing NASA as a whole. I haven't read the whole thing (the blurry foo is too hard to tolerate for more than a couple of pages) but I got the impression that all projects were voted on to get the ranking. We know that the Langley work is done through some black discretionary funds. I just hope this doesn't end up with a SWAPAR-like ban on ANY work. (Any news from them, by the way?)
RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR???
SPAWAR? Navy lab work - Pam Mossier From: Wm. Scott Smith [mailto:scott...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 3:10 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR??? I don't know how to find this, not even in google Alan, what is SWAPAR Ban??? Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:06:53 -0800 To: vortex-l@eskimo.commailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com From: a...@well.commailto:a...@well.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap At 06:01 PM 2/1/2012, David Roberson wrote: They are expecting great things from fusion I see. Wonder what happened to the positive outlook that they expressed earlier? I think that the positive outlook is only two labs who seem to believe it, versus this report representing NASA as a whole. I haven't read the whole thing (the blurry foo is too hard to tolerate for more than a couple of pages) but I got the impression that all projects were voted on to get the ranking. We know that the Langley work is done through some black discretionary funds. I just hope this doesn't end up with a SWAPAR-like ban on ANY work. (Any news from them, by the way?)
RE: [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR???
SWAPAR, like SAPWAR, is a misspelling of the acronym SPAWAR. Navy Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command. They, like NASA, had been researching cold fusion/LENR. Under a small glare of media attention, their program was possibly cancelled. There is a wealth of information available by simply googling SPAWAR LENR Is was revelaed, and covered on Vortex, here: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg59243.html From: scott...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:09:43 -0800 Subject: [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR??? I don't know how to find this, not even in google Alan, what is SWAPAR Ban??? Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:06:53 -0800 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com From: a...@well.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Roadmap At 06:01 PM 2/1/2012, David Roberson wrote: They are expecting great things from fusion I see. Wonder what happened to the positive outlook that they expressed earlier? I think that the positive outlook is only two labs who seem to believe it, versus this report representing NASA as a whole. I haven't read the whole thing (the blurry foo is too hard to tolerate for more than a couple of pages) but I got the impression that all projects were voted on to get the ranking. We know that the Langley work is done through some black discretionary funds. I just hope this doesn't end up with a SWAPAR-like ban on ANY work. (Any news from them, by the way?)
RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Alan, what is SWAPAR???
At 12:32 PM 2/2/2012, Roarty, Francis X wrote: SPAWAR? Navy lab work Pam Mossier Yup ... typo.
