Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

2016-11-30 Thread Jones Beene
If I was offered a choice between owning 100% of Rossi's ecat IP and a cafe 
latte at Starbucks, the coffee wins, hands down.
 

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:52 AM, "bobcook39...@gmail.com" 
<bobcook39...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 

 #yiv1696070789 #yiv1696070789 -- _filtered #yiv1696070789 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 
4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1696070789 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 
4 3 2 4;}#yiv1696070789 #yiv1696070789 p.yiv1696070789MsoNormal, #yiv1696070789 
li.yiv1696070789MsoNormal, #yiv1696070789 div.yiv1696070789MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}#yiv1696070789 a:link, 
#yiv1696070789 span.yiv1696070789MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1696070789 a:visited, #yiv1696070789 
span.yiv1696070789MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1696070789 
.yiv1696070789MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv1696070789 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv1696070789 div.yiv1696070789WordSection1 {}#yiv1696070789 
Brian—  With all due respect, there IS Rossi IP.  It was identified in the 
Rossi/IH contract in an Appendix—very specific.  I read it all.  It was 
generally referred to as E-Cat IP and specified in several different documents, 
including the E-Cat US patent as I recall.    It did not include much technical 
information about Pd and D reactions and reactors, which may cause it to be 
worthless SOUR GRAPES in some people’s estimation.     If it were worthless as 
you indicate, it certainly has spurred a lot of Ni-H LENR technology and LENR+ 
development (as Peter Gluck so consistently identifies) to produce investment 
in R around the World.  I admit that I am frequently confused, but not about 
Rossi’s alleged fraudulent life.  My main confusion is trying to understand the 
motives of people who attempt to discredit  Rossi’s work.  I am concluding 
after following the treatment of P in 1989 and thereafter that some of the 
same motives that drove the discrediting of P are pertinent to deciding how 
Rossi should be handled.  In a political realm I consider such motives would be 
labeled conservative and in opposition to progressive peoples’ motives.    Bob 
Cook  From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?  There is no IP!!!  Every time 
you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent  life, you get confused. Rossi has 
absolutely nothing.    
 I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about 
February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing 
hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however. Bob Cook  
    

 
   

RE: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

2016-11-30 Thread bobcook39923
Brian—

With all due respect, there IS Rossi IP.  It was identified in the Rossi/IH 
contract in an Appendix—very specific.  I read it all.  It was generally 
referred to as E-Cat IP and specified in several different documents, including 
the E-Cat US patent as I recall.  

It did not include much technical information about Pd and D reactions and 
reactors, which may cause it to be worthless SOUR GRAPES in some people’s 
estimation.   

If it were worthless as you indicate, it certainly has spurred a lot of Ni-H 
LENR technology and LENR+ development (as Peter Gluck so consistently 
identifies) to produce investment in R around the World.

I admit that I am frequently confused, but not about Rossi’s alleged fraudulent 
life.  My main confusion is trying to understand the motives of people who 
attempt to discredit  Rossi’s work.

I am concluding after following the treatment of P in 1989 and thereafter 
that some of the same motives that drove the discrediting of P are pertinent 
to deciding how Rossi should be handled.  In a political realm I consider such 
motives would be labeled conservative and in opposition to progressive peoples’ 
motives.  

Bob Cook

From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

There is no IP!!!

Every time you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent  life, you get confused. Rossi 
has absolutely nothing.



 
I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about 
February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing 
hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however.
 
Bob Cook
 
 




Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

2016-11-30 Thread Brian Ahern
There is no IP!!!


Every time you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent  life, you get confused. Rossi 
has absolutely nothing.





I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about 
February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing 
hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however.

Bob Cook





Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

2016-11-30 Thread Alain Sepeda
To control, or to develop?

LENR cannot be controlled or it will die.
Modern entrepreneur know that.

Not more simple than controlling teenagers during springbreak.

2016-11-29 17:57 GMT+01:00 :

> With the recent information from Italy (Giuseppe, Navarro and Coppi)
> reported on Rossi’s blog;  the information from LENR Forum about Gates
> interaction with La Gatta (apparently in Padua, It during the ICCF-19);
> Texas Tech interaction with La Gatta’s firm in Italy;  La Gatta’s
> interaction with IH in N.C.,  and Gates support of LENR at Texas Tech, is
> Gates involved in IH via. La Gatta’s firm or Texas Tech or both?
>
>
>
> The plot thickens.  And the Court Case may reveal much more about the IH
> supporters and  action to control the Ni-H LENR technology.
>
>
>
> I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen
> about February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money
> changing hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
>
>


[Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

2016-11-29 Thread bobcook39923
With the recent information from Italy (Giuseppe, Navarro and Coppi) reported 
on Rossi’s blog;  the information from LENR Forum about Gates interaction with 
La Gatta (apparently in Padua, It during the ICCF-19); Texas Tech interaction 
with La Gatta’s firm in Italy;  La Gatta’s interaction with IH in N.C.,  and 
Gates support of LENR at Texas Tech, is Gates involved in IH via. La Gatta’s 
firm or Texas Tech or both?

The plot thickens.  And the Court Case may reveal much more about the IH 
supporters and  action to control the Ni-H LENR technology.  

I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about 
February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing 
hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however.

Bob Cook